Burrito wrote:With the addition of Wichita State, the AAC is trending up while other conferences like the A-10, MVC and MWC are trending down. But Stever, that is a bold move to proclaim a P7.
Also, I see the Big East Moderator on CSNBBS posted a comment yesterday basically blaming you for killing the Big East board over there with your constant negativity about the conference's prospects.
Burrito wrote:http://csnbbs.com/thread-834427-page-4.html
"I must have been a pretty terrible mod, because I let one poster I respect speak his mind about how he was very down on the future potential of the C7 Big East without the football schools, and the result was most of the posters migrated to a board with a much more rah-rah pro-Big East moderation policy."
paulxu wrote:This P7 thingy definitely needs its own logo.
AAAACK current conference RPI 9th. OOC SOS 28th!
gtmoBlue wrote:kayako wrote:Looking at the schedules of each BE teams, I'd be a little surprised if we finish above .500 again.
Sheesh... Positive Quote of the Week. You get the No-Prize.
kayako wrote:gtmoBlue wrote:kayako wrote:Looking at the schedules of each BE teams, I'd be a little surprised if we finish above .500 again.
Sheesh... Positive Quote of the Week. You get the No-Prize.
We all know the BE is a great conference and going below . 500 doesn't change that. The schedule doesn't look very favorable overall. Nova will finish with total of 1 stinking game VS. football schools before the tournament, while DePaul seems hellbent on going 0-6...
Burrito wrote:http://csnbbs.com/thread-834427-page-4.html
"I must have been a pretty terrible mod, because I let one poster I respect speak his mind about how he was very down on the future potential of the C7 Big East without the football schools, and the result was most of the posters migrated to a board with a much more rah-rah pro-Big East moderation policy."
GoldenWarrior11 wrote:Burrito wrote:http://csnbbs.com/thread-834427-page-4.html
"I must have been a pretty terrible mod, because I let one poster I respect speak his mind about how he was very down on the future potential of the C7 Big East without the football schools, and the result was most of the posters migrated to a board with a much more rah-rah pro-Big East moderation policy."
A majority of BE posters on CSNBBS left because of the outright and blatant personal attacks against posters, as well as the general illogical and non-sensical arguments that a small number, but incredibly vocal, of their posters made against C7 posters. Here, there are really only two posters that continue to stir the pot (you know who you are), and it is a much more enjoyable Big East-focused and related discussion without the infusion of negativity or the purposeful devaluing of on-court success. It is sad to see the Big East forum over there become a graveyard, but that's what happens when you allow so many tiring, repeated, and skewed, arguments - with the cloak of "true" discussion - to take place.
Many of those toxic posters have since been banned (there is an influx of new ones), but there is never a shortage of professional trollage that simply feed the egos of many of the posters over there. I do hope that for the sake of our board, we are not as tolerant with blatant attempts of pot-stirring and with endless and countless arguments that either diminish what our conference or members are, or - more importantly - continue to promote or elevate other conferences that our schools do not belong to. This is a Big East board. If you don't like the Big East, it's members, or the established perception of the league, then I'd recommend going to another board where those thoughts are accepted and embraced.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 45 guests