This actually looks about right. Depending on who leaves on some of the other teams, there might be additional movement. Creighton has two scollies now and depending on who they get, they could go as high as 4th. They would have to get players that would play and help immediately. We have a big gap in the middle and no natural 5. Epperson will be good at some point, but he needs time!brewcity77 wrote:1) Villanova: Jay Wright simply reloaded. Bridges & Brunson both have BEPOY potential.
2) Xavier: Assuming Blueitt comes back. Started figuring it out without Sumner, should be a force next year.
3) Seton Hall: Assuming Delgado comes back. Experienced & tough, last run with this class.
4) Marquette: Offense will still be efficient, defense almost has to be better.
5) Providence: Return everyone from a solid, not spectacular team. Expect them to be solid, not spectacular again.
6) Butler: Lost a ton, though Chris Holtmann always manages to overachieve.
7) Creighton: Patton is a big loss. Joseph might be okay, but he didn't produce like Watson at his first stop. They'll have to show me before I'm a believer.
8) St. John's: I for one don't think 8 in the NCAAs is impossible, and I could easily see the Johnnies 2-3 spots higher, but the league is just so good.
9) DePaul: Losing Garrett is addition by subtraction. Moving (barely) up the table.
10) Georgetown: No Pryor, no Peak, no chance. Ewing might turn it around, but this year he's in a car that is already mid-air off the cliff.
DudeAnon wrote:No love for Marquette, they had 2 stud freshmen this year.
milksteak wrote:DudeAnon wrote:No love for Marquette, they had 2 stud freshmen this year.
Late to respond to this, but they lose three of their top-five scorers. But that's not even the most grim thing they will face next year. I think Marquette is going to really struggle on the glass in 2017-2018.
milksteak wrote:DudeAnon wrote:No love for Marquette, they had 2 stud freshmen this year.
Late to respond to this, but they lose three of their top-five scorers. But that's not even the most grim thing they will face next year. I think Marquette is going to really struggle on the glass in 2017-2018.
MUBoxer wrote:xusandy wrote:That's some powerful stuff you're either smokin' or snortin' over there, Hoya33. (1) Creighton without Patton is still clearly a top half team in the league, and (2) Xavier without Blueitt will ONLY have 4 returning starters and ONLY 4 4-star recruits coming in. The Hoyas will have ....... hope. You probably got DePaul right though.
Regarding your point on Xavier I remember a Marquette team that went to the Elite 8 and had four starters coming back and a top 10 recruiting class coming in picked first in this new league... didn't work out too well for us so if I were you I'd never count my chickens before they hatch.
milksteak wrote:DudeAnon wrote:No love for Marquette, they had 2 stud freshmen this year.
Late to respond to this, but they lose three of their top-five scorers. But that's not even the most grim thing they will face next year. I think Marquette is going to really struggle on the glass in 2017-2018.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests