Westbrook#36 wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:
That is a badass site.
I really like this guy for a couple of reasons. First, he has 7 Big East teams "safely in." Gotta raise a glass to that.
Second, he has Syracuse in his first 4 out. That gives me a nice warm feeling because it can only mean that St John's cost the Orange a bid. If Syracuse wins that game, they're in. To think, this could be Boeheim's last season and he could go out with a bitter taste in his mouth because the Johnnies blocked him from the tournament. Oh, the pain. The humanity. Cry me a river.
Here you go.
Westbrook#36 wrote:The point is the same as yours was to kayako, your just as guilty as anyone else of taking these sites "seriously". We all do it this time of year, we all have our own favorite bracket/seeding sites and bracketologists. Apologies if that response was in jest, but then again if that's what your point was, then so was mine.
Bill Marsh wrote:Westbrook#36 wrote:The point is the same as yours was to kayako, your just as guilty as anyone else of taking these sites "seriously". We all do it this time of year, we all have our own favorite bracket/seeding sites and bracketologists. Apologies if that response was in jest, but then again if that's what your point was, then so was mine.
If you've read my posts to Stever over the past 6 weeks or so, then you know that I don't take bravketology seriously. But it's all good either way.
Bill Marsh wrote:So you take some of these "bracketology" sites seriously?
kayako wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:So you take some of these "bracketology" sites seriously?
As far as chance of bid% goes, I like the "dance card" much better personally.
http://www.unf.edu/~jcoleman/dance.htm
Bracketology? It's not hard for most "bracketologists" to get 65 or so teams correct, but if you're expecting correct seedings and matchups, it's pretty much crapshoot as you say. I am just interested in where the BE teams stand, and the last few spots up for grabs. This is the first season that my two interests are aligned since the formation of the NBE.
SJHooper wrote:Whether we get 5, 6, or 7 in, one thing is for sure: someone not named Villanova better do something or we will build a reputation for being a 1 trick pony...Nova and everyone else. Would be nice to see Butler and Seton Hall make the Sweet 16 which I think is possible. Creighton was my darkhorse Elite 8 pick until Watson went down. If everyone was healthy I really think 3-4 Big East teams could have made the Sweet 16. I'm getting nervous that Nova will be upset early (hard to follow a run like that last year) and no one else will step up.
SJHooper wrote:Whether we get 5, 6, or 7 in, one thing is for sure: someone not named Villanova better do something or we will build a reputation for being a 1 trick pony...Nova and everyone else. Would be nice to see Butler and Seton Hall make the Sweet 16 which I think is possible. Creighton was my darkhorse Elite 8 pick until Watson went down. If everyone was healthy I really think 3-4 Big East teams could have made the Sweet 16. I'm getting nervous that Nova will be upset early (hard to follow a run like that last year) and no one else will step up.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests