Jet915 wrote:Creighton can be that team next year with two big IFs: Patton stays for another year and Bowen commits. That could arguably give us one of the best starting 5's in the nation: Mintz/Joseph, Foster, Thomas, Bowen and Patton.
Jet915 wrote:Creighton can be that team next year with two big IFs: Patton stays for another year and Bowen commits. That could arguably give us one of the best starting 5's in the nation: Mintz/Joseph, Foster, Thomas, Bowen and Patton.
Hall2012 wrote:Jet915 wrote:Creighton can be that team next year with two big IFs: Patton stays for another year and Bowen commits. That could arguably give us one of the best starting 5's in the nation: Mintz/Joseph, Foster, Thomas, Bowen and Patton.
Along those same lines, Seton Hall could be that team next year with two big IFS: Delgado stays for his senior year and Trevon Duval commits. That would give the Pirates a starting 5 of 4 seniors and a surefire 1-and-done lottery pick point guard. Duval, Carrington, Rodriguez, Sanogo, Delgado.
herodotus wrote:Hall2012 wrote:Jet915 wrote:Creighton can be that team next year with two big IFs: Patton stays for another year and Bowen commits. That could arguably give us one of the best starting 5's in the nation: Mintz/Joseph, Foster, Thomas, Bowen and Patton.
Along those same lines, Seton Hall could be that team next year with two big IFS: Delgado stays for his senior year and Trevon Duval commits. That would give the Pirates a starting 5 of 4 seniors and a surefire 1-and-done lottery pick point guard. Duval, Carrington, Rodriguez, Sanogo, Delgado.
Anyone think Willard will exit after the season if SH has a big year in 2018? Teams that lose five starters tend to fall off the next year unless they're named Kentucky, or Duke.
ecasadoSBU wrote:Whether Villanova wins a national championship or not this league will be fine. I think the inferiority complex needs to go...
How often does a PAC-12 team win it all? How often does B10 team win it all? or a SEC team besides Kentucky? Even a B12 team? Those are still strong conference and respected.
At the end of the day... the B.E has demonstrated it will continue to be in the running as the best college basketball conference... very least TOP 3. That is unlikely to change
kayako wrote:They need to first make the Final Four or better, and then sustain that success.
Not that I am dying to add them, but that's exactly what Wichita State and VCU is doing?
Jet915 wrote:Creighton can be that team next year with two big IFs: Patton stays for another year and Bowen commits. That could arguably give us one of the best starting 5's in the nation: Mintz/Joseph, Foster, Thomas, Bowen and Patton.
JohnW22 wrote:Jet915 wrote:Creighton can be that team next year with two big IFs: Patton stays for another year and Bowen commits. That could arguably give us one of the best starting 5's in the nation: Mintz/Joseph, Foster, Thomas, Bowen and Patton.
I might be wrong but didn't Creighton turn down Cane Broome for Joseph?
adoraz wrote:kayako wrote:They need to first make the Final Four or better, and then sustain that success.
Not that I am dying to add them, but that's exactly what Wichita State and VCU is doing?
They got to their current national prestige by doing that, but they need to prove they're a power. For VCU, it's been six years (first FF in history) and Wichita it's been 4 (second in history). VCU in fact only has ONE Sweet 16 despite all their recent success. National powers win championships and go to the FF more consistently.
Best case would obviously be for these schools to do what Nova did last year. In that case I don't think the Big East could/should say no.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests