Dave wrote:If only UConn joins the 20 game double round robin is a nice fit.
Projecting that it will cause BE bubble teams to miss the tourney is a reach. If they drop dreg games for a stringer SOS that is taken into account. If the selection was based solely on number of wins everyone would be seeking a weak SOS, which is not the case.
UConn strengthens the conference and the SOS. It likely improves the schedule of all members.
More importantly from bmorex:UConn provides:
1. National brand (just a down year, IMO. I'm not going to try and argue otherwise, just my opinion)
2. Increased attendance at MSG (which should help to extend the contract when it is up)
3. Interest from FOX (and in general, the next TV contract)
4. Traditional rival for half the league
stever20 wrote:the thing that I don't get is the logic that going to 20 games to keep the precious round robin will automatically help the conference get more spots.
The games that would be taken out of the OOC schedule won't be the exempt tourney games, it won't be the Gavitt games, it won't be the top tier games. It'll be the dreg games.
So let's take Seton Hall this year. The games that would get removed would be your games like Fairleigh Dickinson, Central Conn., or Delaware. 2 wins. Replaced with UConn. So say they go 1-1 in those 2 vs UConn. Now, instead of Seton Hall being where they are at 15-9 they would be at 14-10, and in far more danger of missing the tourney.
Hall2012 wrote:stever20 wrote:the thing that I don't get is the logic that going to 20 games to keep the precious round robin will automatically help the conference get more spots.
The games that would be taken out of the OOC schedule won't be the exempt tourney games, it won't be the Gavitt games, it won't be the top tier games. It'll be the dreg games.
So let's take Seton Hall this year. The games that would get removed would be your games like Fairleigh Dickinson, Central Conn., or Delaware. 2 wins. Replaced with UConn. So say they go 1-1 in those 2 vs UConn. Now, instead of Seton Hall being where they are at 15-9 they would be at 14-10, and in far more danger of missing the tourney.
The point is that replacing two cupcakes with UConn (in most years, this year is an obvious exception) would be an easy SOS and thus RPI boost. Of course, you still have to win the games, but it's not like beating CCSU and UDEL are doing anything for Seton Hall's resume. Replace them with two wins over UConn, and the Pirates are suddenly on much better footing.
Wait. Stever is arguing that having having 2 cupcake games is better than a yearly home-home with UCONN?
Dave wrote:Wait. Stever is arguing that having having 2 cupcake games is better than a yearly home-home with UCONN?
It must be easier to get a bid if you are in the America East.
billyjack wrote:Marquette has an RPI of 85, SOS of 66, and a W-L of 15-10.
Using RPI Wizard:
If you remove their 2 weakest wins:
- SIU-Edwardsville (332) and
- Howard (344)...
and replace them with a split, and therefore a W-L of 14-11, with the following teams:
- Providence (68), their RPI would be 71, SOS 48.
- or Seton Hall (49), their RPI would be 69, SOS 42.
- or Creighton (17), their RPI would be 58, SOS 27.
Assuming UConn could most years maintain an RPI in the 40's or 50's at a minimum, then a 20 game BE schedule would be fantastic. Games vs Howard, Maine, St Francis Brooklyn, etc, are millstones around our necks... replacing those with UConn matchups would be great.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 15 guests