Bracketology '17

The home for Big East hoops

Re: Bracketology '17

Postby Hall2012 » Tue Jan 31, 2017 10:24 am

JohnW22 wrote:
Hall2012 wrote:
JohnW22 wrote:Well Xavier needs to lose a little and drop to the 11 seed or win a little more and jump to the 6 seed. As easy as it sounds right? :D


I vote option A. They can start by losing tomorrow ;)

Seton Hall has had Xavier's number and I don't see that changing this year


I guess you're in the minority lol. From what I've seen, most X fans seem to expect a comfortable win tomorrow, even without Sumner.
Seton Hall Pirates
Big East Tournament Champions: 1991, 1993, 2016
Big East Regular Season Champions: 1992, 1993, 2020
Hall2012
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 3:04 pm

Re: Bracketology '17

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Bracketology '17

Postby stever20 » Tue Jan 31, 2017 10:54 am

Marquette fans right now are far more worried just about making the tourney.

Marquette right now reminds me of Seton Hall last year. Where they won the Big East tourney, and still wound up as the last 6 seed. Garbage OOC schedule will hurt their seed big time(and there's no conjecture about that at all- it wasn't good).

Why I discount teams going undefeated and running the table from here. Of the 351 teams in d1- only 10 are undefeated in conference play at the 50% mark. Only 25 have 1 loss. Sure it could happen. But realistically it won't happen. There's a ton of parity in college basketball where it's really hard to go on a run like you describe. I mean just look at last week with the top 10 teams in the nation and all the losses they took.
stever20
 
Posts: 13488
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:43 pm

Re: Bracketology '17

Postby Bill Marsh » Tue Jan 31, 2017 10:58 am

Hall2012 wrote:
JohnW22 wrote:
Hall2012 wrote:
I vote option A. They can start by losing tomorrow ;)

Seton Hall has had Xavier's number and I don't see that changing this year


I guess you're in the minority lol. From what I've seen, most X fans seem to expect a comfortable win tomorrow, even without Sumner.


Can Summer be replaced that easily?
Bill Marsh
 
Posts: 4239
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:43 am

Re: Bracketology '17

Postby JohnW22 » Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:07 am

Bill Marsh wrote:Can Summer be replaced that easily?

No, and it won't be close. At the same time I think Xavier's plan B for Sumner is better than Creighton's plan B for Watson but at the same time Creighton is a much better team. Quentin Goodin has to grow up fast which he has in the past two games but he's going to have to play 30-35 minutes a game for the rest of the season. The big question will be who backs Goodin up at the point, I think the most likely option is Bernard as he handled the ball a lot at Florida A&M but that was partly because he was their best player. Will be a really interesting final 10 games. The real question now is if Sumner comes back next season, honestly the ACL injury might be the only thing that keeps him in college for another season.
XU
JohnW22
 
Posts: 758
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2015 2:39 pm

Re: Bracketology '17

Postby stever20 » Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:56 am

1 thing that will be fascinating to see will be in 10 days when they do the 1 month out reveal of the top 4 seeds in each region. That should give bracketologists a good idea of what this years committee is looking at- and will help them out tremendously one would think.
stever20
 
Posts: 13488
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:43 pm

Re: Bracketology '17

Postby GumbyDamnit! » Tue Jan 31, 2017 1:39 pm

stever20 wrote:1 thing that will be fascinating to see will be in 10 days when they do the 1 month out reveal of the top 4 seeds in each region. That should give bracketologists a good idea of what this years committee is looking at- and will help them out tremendously one would think.

Not sure how much it will tell about the bubble criteria at this point since it's only focusing on the Top 16, but we'll see. We could probably pick a combination of 20 teams today that will make up the selections:

Locks:
VU (1)
Zags (1)
KU (1)
UK (2)
Baylor (1)
L'ville (2)
Ariz (2)
UNC (2)

Near Locks:
Wisconsin (3)
Butler (3)

In mix:
UCLA (4)
UVA (3)
WVU (3)
Oregon (4)
FSU (4)
Duke (4)

FL
St Marys
S Car
MD

Outside looking in:
UC
CU
ND
Purdue
X

16 of those top 20 are going to be your top 4 seeds in each region IMO. I put the seeding next to what I expect to see. Lots of hoops between now and then, though...
Go Nova!
User avatar
GumbyDamnit!
 
Posts: 3149
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:39 pm

Re: Bracketology '17

Postby stever20 » Tue Jan 31, 2017 1:50 pm

right but lets look at your 20...
Nova 2 RPI 6 KP
Gonzaga 12 RPI 1 KP
Kansas 3 RPI 8 KP
Kentucky 8 RPI 3 KP
Baylor 1 RPI 7 KP
Louisville 4 RPI 4 KP
Arizona 6 RPI 14 KP
UNC 7 RPI 9 KP
Wisconsin 21 RPI 11 KP
Butler 5 RPI 18 KP
UCLA 22 RPI 17 KP
Virginia 13 RPI 2 KP
West Virginia 27 RPI 5 KP
Oregon 10 RPI 19 KP
Florida St 11 RPI 23 KP
Duke 17 RPI 13 KP
Florida 9 RPI 10 KP
St Mary's 19 RPI 15 KP
South Carolina 20 RPI 24 KP
Maryland 18 RPI 40 KP
Cincy 16 RPI 16 KP
Creighton 15 RPI 25 KP
Notre Dame 25 RPI 27 KP
Purdue 30 RPI 12 KP
Xavier 14 RPI 28 KP

It'll be interesting to see- and telling- where and if West Virginia is included. They have pretty poor RPI, but a great Ken Pom. Conversely a team like a Florida St would be great RPI, poor Ken Pom. Things like that will be huge to see.
stever20
 
Posts: 13488
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:43 pm

Re: Bracketology '17

Postby XU85 » Tue Jan 31, 2017 2:09 pm

Hall 2012:

Where are those X fans of which you speak? X was a mess before Sumner got hurt and never really put it together this year. As John pointed out, next to Nova the Hall is the one team that really seems to have X's number even when X was favored. I know of no one expecting a win, much less a comfortable win.
Xavier, 85 & 87
XU85
 
Posts: 274
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 1:40 pm

Re: Bracketology '17

Postby Hall2012 » Tue Jan 31, 2017 2:24 pm

XU85 wrote:Hall 2012:

Where are those X fans of which you speak? X was a mess before Sumner got hurt and never really put it together this year. As John pointed out, next to Nova the Hall is the one team that really seems to have X's number even when X was favored. I know of no one expecting a win, much less a comfortable win.


I was mainly referencing the XavierHoops.com pick the score thread for the game. While I obviously expected the majority to pick X (that's how being a fan works), I was surprised to see it completely unanimous. And more than a few by 3+ possessions.
Seton Hall Pirates
Big East Tournament Champions: 1991, 1993, 2016
Big East Regular Season Champions: 1992, 1993, 2020
Hall2012
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 3:04 pm

Re: Bracketology '17

Postby XU85 » Tue Jan 31, 2017 2:36 pm

Hall2012 wrote:
XU85 wrote:Hall 2012:

Where are those X fans of which you speak? X was a mess before Sumner got hurt and never really put it together this year. As John pointed out, next to Nova the Hall is the one team that really seems to have X's number even when X was favored. I know of no one expecting a win, much less a comfortable win.


I was mainly referencing the XavierHoops.com pick the score thread for the game. While I obviously expected the majority to pick X (that's how being a fan works), I was surprised to see it completely unanimous. And more than a few by 3+ possessions.



That makes sense. I don't usually look at the prediction thread, but now that you mention it, I did earlier to today and remembered being surprised by all the predictions of X winning (although the margin of victory seemed smaller than usual).
Xavier, 85 & 87
XU85
 
Posts: 274
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 1:40 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Big East basketball message board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests