billyjack wrote:Westbrook#36 wrote:I think we're beginning to see there's is a clear separation between the top half and bottom half of the BE. BTW, where are the posters who were serving up crow sandwiches a few weeks ago about where the Friars were predicted to finish during the preseason???
Yeah, i thought it was really bad karma a month ago when the "PC finishing 9th" debates were in high gear. Me, i specifically avoided those threads cuz the Friars were so young and young teams are inconsistent.
My points of defense for PC a couple of weeks ago were when someone on this site started making up numbers for Bullock, and dismissing solid wins vs UMass and whoever where i defended PC, and I also pointed to competitive losses at Ohio State and vs Virginia.
Tonight, in fairness to PC, Cartwright played great but had no lift due to his leg... plus he got chop blocked with about 8 minutes to go which banged his knee, made him basically immobile, and hurt his hand.
Lindsey didn't play at all with a bum wrist, which he had a cast on.
Drew Edwards (PG who made the inbounds to Bullock for winning shot vs USC in NCAA's) reinjured his knee in mid December and is supposedly out for the rest of the year.
So we had a 10 point lead the entire 2nd half. We stalled the ball once Cartwright's got dinged, to shorten the game, and DePaul made clutch plays. Our turnovers all game though were horrendous, just a ton of wasted possessions. Terrible unnecessary loss.
I know i'm making excuses, but those have been important factors recently.
Anyway, between this loss and the one at BC, these are 2 terrible demoralizing losses.
Edrick wrote:That would have been a fine assertion. There's basically no way the Big East get less than five teams. Six is significantly more likely than four.
I think sometimes forget there are 68 teams in the Tournament. Teams like freaking Tulsa, last year, make it.
stever20 wrote:Edrick wrote:That would have been a fine assertion. There's basically no way the Big East get less than five teams. Six is significantly more likely than four.
I think sometimes forget there are 68 teams in the Tournament. Teams like freaking Tulsa, last year, make it.
Sorry but there is totally a way for Big East to get less than 5 teams..... If the top 4 teams split off and go like 45-3 vs the other 6 teams, not losing to more than 1 of the teams 2x, it's going to be really tough to get 5 in, let alone 6. And Marquette who looks like #6 is not a great candidate because they didn't do much OOC. They need 10 wins, and that's pretty close to impossible if they finish 6th.
As far as the point to what we know today that SH would be in, that's fine- but today isn't selection Sunday. Seton Hall has still got to get 7 more wins, with a brutal schedule. Yes, SH may get a win or 2 vs the top 4 teams. But they also might drop a few games against the other 6.
Bill Marsh wrote:stever20 wrote:Edrick wrote:That would have been a fine assertion. There's basically no way the Big East get less than five teams. Six is significantly more likely than four.
I think sometimes forget there are 68 teams in the Tournament. Teams like freaking Tulsa, last year, make it.
Sorry but there is totally a way for Big East to get less than 5 teams..... If the top 4 teams split off and go like 45-3 vs the other 6 teams, not losing to more than 1 of the teams 2x, it's going to be really tough to get 5 in, let alone 6. And Marquette who looks like #6 is not a great candidate because they didn't do much OOC. They need 10 wins, and that's pretty close to impossible if they finish 6th.
As far as the point to what we know today that SH would be in, that's fine- but today isn't selection Sunday. Seton Hall has still got to get 7 more wins, with a brutal schedule. Yes, SH may get a win or 2 vs the top 4 teams. But they also might drop a few games against the other 6.
Yes, right now they project as bubble team. Could go either way, so now guarantees. With their experienced core group, I like their chances.
What do you think of their chances?
Edrick wrote:That would have been a fine assertion. There's basically no way the Big East get less than five teams. Six is significantly more likely than four.
I think sometimes forget there are 68 teams in the Tournament. Teams like freaking Tulsa, last year, make it.
stever20 wrote:Edrick wrote:That would have been a fine assertion. There's basically no way the Big East get less than five teams. Six is significantly more likely than four.
I think sometimes forget there are 68 teams in the Tournament. Teams like freaking Tulsa, last year, make it.
Sorry but there is totally a way for Big East to get less than 5 teams..... If the top 4 teams split off and go like 45-3 vs the other 6 teams, not losing to more than 1 of the teams 2x, it's going to be really tough to get 5 in, let alone 6. And Marquette who looks like #6 is not a great candidate because they didn't do much OOC. They need 10 wins, and that's pretty close to impossible if they finish 6th.
As far as the point to what we know today that SH would be in, that's fine- but today isn't selection Sunday. Seton Hall has still got to get 7 more wins, with a brutal schedule. Yes, SH may get a win or 2 vs the top 4 teams. But they also might drop a few games against the other 6.
GumbyDamnit! wrote:Hall2012 wrote:
why do you look at those 7 games and think 7 losses? Seton Hall is perfectly capable of beating any of the top 4, including Nova who they've beaten in every season since realignment.
**DING** **DING** **DING** The ref has decided to stop the fight. We have our winner!
Anyone who is watching college and BE BB regularly, who just ASSUMES that SHU will lose all of those 7 games, is highly suspect. I really like the SHU team. They've got some really good players on that squad who make you earn everyting. They lost on the road @ Creighton. That's it. Would anyone bet against CU at home the rest of the year?
Also don't sleep on Marquette yet. They lost away at SHU and at Nova. They've got a lot of games left to make some noise. Let's just let them play some of the games before we start handing out bids, shall we?
Stever it is far too early for you to start your yearly campaign of how everything is going to break poorly for the BE and perfectly for everyone else. C'mon man!
XUFan09 wrote:GumbyDamnit! wrote:Hall2012 wrote:
why do you look at those 7 games and think 7 losses? Seton Hall is perfectly capable of beating any of the top 4, including Nova who they've beaten in every season since realignment.
**DING** **DING** **DING** The ref has decided to stop the fight. We have our winner!
Anyone who is watching college and BE BB regularly, who just ASSUMES that SHU will lose all of those 7 games, is highly suspect. I really like the SHU team. They've got some really good players on that squad who make you earn everyting. They lost on the road @ Creighton. That's it. Would anyone bet against CU at home the rest of the year?
Also don't sleep on Marquette yet. They lost away at SHU and at Nova. They've got a lot of games left to make some noise. Let's just let them play some of the games before we start handing out bids, shall we?
Stever it is far too early for you to start your yearly campaign of how everything is going to break poorly for the BE and perfectly for everyone else. C'mon man!
Yeah, if Seton Hall gets 7 more attempts in against the top 4 teams, including 3 at home, and they can't pull off at least one or two wins, then they aren't a tournament-quality team anyway. By the way, if we utilize Kenpom probabilities (the same ones selectively used by Stever), the odds of SHU losing all 7 games is 7.8%.
XUFan09 wrote:GumbyDamnit! wrote:Hall2012 wrote:
why do you look at those 7 games and think 7 losses? Seton Hall is perfectly capable of beating any of the top 4, including Nova who they've beaten in every season since realignment.
**DING** **DING** **DING** The ref has decided to stop the fight. We have our winner!
Anyone who is watching college and BE BB regularly, who just ASSUMES that SHU will lose all of those 7 games, is highly suspect. I really like the SHU team. They've got some really good players on that squad who make you earn everyting. They lost on the road @ Creighton. That's it. Would anyone bet against CU at home the rest of the year?
Also don't sleep on Marquette yet. They lost away at SHU and at Nova. They've got a lot of games left to make some noise. Let's just let them play some of the games before we start handing out bids, shall we?
Stever it is far too early for you to start your yearly campaign of how everything is going to break poorly for the BE and perfectly for everyone else. C'mon man!
Yeah, if Seton Hall gets 7 more attempts in against the top 4 teams, including 3 at home, and they can't pull off at least one or two wins, then they aren't a tournament-quality team anyway. By the way, if we utilize Kenpom probabilities (the same ones selectively used by Stever), the odds of SHU losing all 7 games is 7.8%.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 24 guests