DudeAnon wrote:adoraz wrote:
Our league-wide strategy should be to have all OUR teams in a competitive position to draw as much eyeballs, media, recruits, money into the league. The bids will come no matter what happens when you have #1 RPI
Except that with a 10 team round robin league, getting a 6th team in is absolutely no lock at all whatsoever. If Marquette or Providence finish 6th at 9-9(or worse)- they probably aren't making the tournament. Their OOC just wasn't good enough to make it.
You just can't say Big East is #1 league, they get 6 bids. Teams earn bids, conferences don't.
adoraz wrote:Keep in mind for SJU- the team is the fourth least experienced team in the country and under performed OOC. Most of their losses were very close. Their Kenpom is #96 and their RPI should head in that direction.
SJU was a brutal loss last year because they finished 1-17 in Big East play but I see them finishing with an RPI around 100 this year.
XUFan09 wrote:I'm only getting caught up in the numbers as much as the numbers influence tournament selection and seeding. I've said that I could reasonably see them getting as many as 7 conference wins, so clearly my own judgment isn't tied to what their projected RPI says of them. You seem to think I don't expect much of SJU simply because I've explained that numerically they don't look good, never mind what I've said to the contrary.
St. John's is very likely going to be a sub-100 team per RPI (and not even borderline). That's a fact and it's because RPI isn't nearly as dynamic as Kenpom, Sagarin, etc. Now, a loss to a team outside the RPI top 100 is the definition of a bad loss. Therefore, the loss to SJU is likely to be a bad loss for Butler. It's that simple, regardless of whether it's fair. Though individual members of the Committee who cover the Big East might be able to give better context to the numbers, the first look for Butler is still two losses to sub-100 teams. By first look, I'm referring to the profile sheet of every potential tournament team that the Committee members get, which are primarily based on the RPI. This isn't the end of the world, but it makes things tougher for Butler.
If it was up to me, Kenpom and other advanced metrics would be used to judge the quality of opponents, because they better reflect the ebbs and flows of a season to which you refer (and are better metrics in general for the difficulty of an opponent, anyway). In that case, SJU would probably not be a bad loss unless they tank from this point on. Unfortunately, the RPI is the foundational criteria for the Selection Committee, and by mid-season, it's not that flexible to allow for a team noticeably improving like SJU might be in the process of doing.
Now, if you REALLY think there is even a moderate probability that SJU will win 10+ conference games, considering the other teams in the league, then we are operating on different premises. "It could happen" does not automatically translate to it being remotely likely.
REDMEN1415 wrote:Irishdawg wrote:SJHooper wrote:If you are a Butler fan, don't hang your head...honestly we have been way overdue for wins like these, you just happened to be the one to fall victim. When you underperform for so long, you are bound to steal some you weren't supposed to get regardless of who it is. We were one of the most unlucky teams in basketball during OOC before the Cuse win (KenPom actually ranks luck and we were top 10 worst in all of division 1). The law of averages swings the other way eventually. It's really such a shame we played so poorly in OOC...if we would have done well and avoided bad losses while winning 2 of those Minny/MSU/PSU/VCU games plus our Cuse and #13 Butler win, we would be a top 25 team on Monday. We can't look back, gotta look forward. Teams know not to take us lightly now, so we have to keep up the intensity. We all knew we had the talent to beat the best teams, we just didn't put it together until recently.
One really big question for me is why is Williams not getting more playing time? He can be erratic at times, but he has shown a very light touch around the rim and he can even make mid range and 3 pt shots. He was a 4 star recruit playing at Iowa State and he did well until he got hurt. He should be getting more PT especially given that Sima is gone and Amar has been hurt. Though Amar is now back, he's still better than him and should play over him. By the way, random point but I liked listening to Holtmann in the huddle mic'd up. He actually got me all pumped up and I'm not even a Butler fan Mullin still has a ways to go but man I hope we turned the corner. Turning the corner in the sense of consistently decent play not always winning.
Congrats to you guys, your team played harder and did what they had to do to win. Butler's players need to realize they aren't going to win games just because there's a number next to their name because they don't have the talent to beat anyone of substance, let alone a Big East team on the road without a good approach on both ends of the court. The Johnnies are going to be really talented for the next few years, really hope they get to a consistent high level of play going forward.
No let down at DePaul, and a tough competitive game vs.Creighton and I'll start feeling good about the Redmen.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 25 guests