Westbrook#36 wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:Westbrook#36 wrote:Of course 6 isn't a lock, but it's looking like a very good possibility. 7 is an absolute dream scenario, my post was only meant to show how the win distribution needs to reasonably occur to get 7, that's all, nothing more nothing less. Now comes the inevitable stever post claiming the BE will be lucky to get 5 in and that 6 is a pipe dream, meanwhile the AAC is on schedule to get 5 bids.
There's always the problem of bids getting stolen by upset winners in conference tournaments. Schools like Providence, Seton Hall, and Marquette would be among the last teams taken, so they'd be among the first to be eliminated by conference tournament upsets.
TBH, my interest is more in the top of the conference sustaining their early success and going into the tournament strong with the ability to go deep into the tournament. Anyone finishing 5-7 in the conference is likely to get a high seed and exit early anyway. Those losses or even non-appearances will be quickly forgotten if the top of the league repeats Villanova's success of last season or something close to it.
That's way I intentionally made the vague "looks like a very good possibility" qualifier about 6 bids, note I never said or implied it was a lock. As for your finishing 5-7 comment, tell that to Baylor(5th & 5 seed) and Iowa St. (6th & 4 seed).
FriarJ wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:Westbrook#36 wrote:Of course 6 isn't a lock, but it's looking like a very good possibility. 7 is an absolute dream scenario, my post was only meant to show how the win distribution needs to reasonably occur to get 7, that's all, nothing more nothing less. Now comes the inevitable stever post claiming the BE will be lucky to get 5 in and that 6 is a pipe dream, meanwhile the AAC is on schedule to get 5 bids.
There's always the problem of bids getting stolen by upset winners in conference tournaments.Schools like Providence, Seton Hall, and Marquette would be among the last teams taken, so they'd be among the first to be eliminated by conference tournament upsets.
TBH, my interest is more in the top of the conference sustaining their early success and going into the tournament strong with the ability to go deep into the tournament. Anyone finishing 5-7 in the conference is likely to get a high seed and exit early anyway. Those losses or even non-appearances will be quickly forgotten if the top of the league repeats Villanova's success of last season or something close to it.
This is going to save me a lot time from watching the actual games this year, can you give me their records now so I can decide if I need to put money aside for postseason travel?
Fieldhouse Flyer wrote:I had a look at this back in August: 2016-17 Preseason Basketball Polls – Post # 12
RPI Forecast is presently predicting that the Top 7 teams will win 75 games and the Bottom 3 teams will win 15 games:
RPI Forecast – Teams # 1 to # 351 . . . RPI Forecast - Big East Conference
Through games of Dec 18, 2016.
Expected RPI: 3
Current RPI: 1
Current OOC Record: 84-25 (0.7706)
Expected OOC Record: 96-29 (0.7680)
Overall - Expected RPI Rank – Team – Projected Regular-season W-L – Projected Conference W-L
1 - 5.0 - Villanova 27-4 (14-4)
12 - 13.7 - Butler 23-7 (12-6)
15 - 18.3 - Xavier 21-10 (11-7)
18 - 22.5 - Creighton 23-7 (11-7)
45 - 54.9 - Providence 19-12 (8-10)
50 - 57.8 - Seton Hall 18-12 (8-10)
55 - 61.5 - Marquette 19-11 (10-8)
64 - 69.5 - Georgetown 17-14 (8-10)
195 - 196.4 - St. John's 9-22 (4-14)
203 - 203.4 - DePaul 11-19 (3-15)
If RPI Forecast is correct, Georgetown will fall on the wrong side of the bubble, and only the Top 4 teams are locks for the NCAA Tournament.
Providence and Seton Hall need to go 9-9 in conference play in order to feel confident on Selection Sunday, and Marquette’s projected OOC SOS Ranking of # 197 drags the Golden Eagles’ RPI Ranking into dangerous territory for an at-large bid.
RPI Forecast – Georgetown Hoyas
Date – Opponent (Opponent’s Projected RPI Ranking) – Venue – Chance of Winning – Projected Point Margin
12-28 - Marquette (61.5) - Away - 32% -5.3
1-4 - Providence (54.9) - Away - 40% -3.0
1-16 - Providence (54.9) - Home - 60% 3.1
2-4 - Seton Hall (57.8) - Home - 61% 3.4
2-11 - Marquette (61.5) - Home - 53% 0.8
2-28 - Seton Hall (57.8) - Away - 41% -2.7
As might be expected, RPI Forecast projects Georgetown to win their home games and lose their away games against the three BE bubble teams.
Bottom Line: in order for the Big East to get 7 teams into the NCAA Tournament, Providence, Seton Hall, Marquette, and Georgetown all need more conference wins than projected, and at the expense of Villanova, Butler, Xavier, and Creighton, which is possible, but highly improbable.
stever20 wrote:was looking last year at the RPI forecast thread that I did comparing RPI projections at start of conference season with end of reg season RPI's....
Xavier 3.8 vs 6 -2.2
Nova 9.5 vs 3 +6.5
Butler 18.4 vs 46 -29.6
PC 33.9 vs 44 -10.1
SH 59.8 vs 33 +26.8
Cre 90.7 vs 99 -8.3
Geo 107.2 vs 104 +3.2
Marq 123.9 vs 108 +15.9
DeP 145.3 vs 186 -40.7
SJ 211.9 vs 233 -21.1
don't think anyone saw Butler's struggles early in the conference season. And didn't see Seton Hall going the way they did either. Outside of those 2, really top 7 were all pretty accurate.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 26 guests