GumbyDamnit! wrote:Still waiting on the teams that you'd like to list ahead of CU, Stever.
stever20 wrote:GumbyDamnit! wrote:Still waiting on the teams that you'd like to list ahead of CU, Stever.
well just in the Big East I would say Nova and Butler. outside the Big East- I'd take Kentucky with today's win over UNC along with Michigan St. Big game for them on Wed vs Louisville. Baylor obviously. Gonzaga with not only the win over Arizona, but also Florida and Iowa St. UCLA with the win over Kentucky and also wins over Texas A&M, Michigan, and Ohio St. So there's about 7 real easy just off the top of the head. I mean, there's a reason why even now with the RPI, Creighton is down to #11.
Creighton has been great(up until today)- but against pretty mediocre opponents. I mean even the RPI now has their SOS down to 84. Only 4 of their 11 opponents have a winning record right now. Their opponents are 54-43 so far when not playing Creighton(vs d1 schools). By comparison- Butler's opponents are 59-41. 7 of Butlers 11 opponents have winning records. And Vermont will be #8.
stever20 wrote:BEhomer wrote:I'll use CBS ranking as an example. #1 SOS is Nebraska at 4 wins and 5 loses. so what the heck are we talking about here?
So who exactly from Creighton's schedule is going to be a surefire NCAA tourney team? Right now they have 1.
Give me Butler's schedule any day of the week. And if they beat Indiana, I'll take Butler at 11-1 with wins over Arizona, Indiana, Cincy, Northwestern, and Utah any day of the week over Creighton at 12-0(remember D2 Truman St doesn't count)- with a win over Wisconsin. What's their next best win? NC State(in a game that would get discounted due to who was missing for NC State)? Plain W/L record just isn't an absolute determinant for me. Hopefully McDermott will actually start to schedule tougher next year.
Creighton's mediocre OOC is going to hurt their seeding come postseason, unless Creighton goes like 16-2 or something like that in the conference.
And Butler's great OOC is going to really help them out come postseason.
Savannah Jay wrote:stever20 wrote:BEhomer wrote:I'll use CBS ranking as an example. #1 SOS is Nebraska at 4 wins and 5 loses. so what the heck are we talking about here?
So who exactly from Creighton's schedule is going to be a surefire NCAA tourney team? Right now they have 1.
Give me Butler's schedule any day of the week. And if they beat Indiana, I'll take Butler at 11-1 with wins over Arizona, Indiana, Cincy, Northwestern, and Utah any day of the week over Creighton at 12-0(remember D2 Truman St doesn't count)- with a win over Wisconsin. What's their next best win? NC State(in a game that would get discounted due to who was missing for NC State)? Plain W/L record just isn't an absolute determinant for me. Hopefully McDermott will actually start to schedule tougher next year.
Creighton's mediocre OOC is going to hurt their seeding come postseason, unless Creighton goes like 16-2 or something like that in the conference.
And Butler's great OOC is going to really help them out come postseason.
I am going to beat this dead damn horse one more time...you actually identified Utah as one of Butler's strong OOC wins. Sensing, since I did not get a response to my inquiry about Northwestern and Utah's RPI compared to NC State and Ole Miss, I thought I'd check. Did you know, Stever, that Utah's RPI is hovering around the 200 mark right now (196 on CBS). Northwestern's is 35. Both Ole Miss (40) and NC State (39) are comparable to Northwestern right now and they "smoke" Utah. What's more, Creighton foes Wisconsin, Nebraska, Akron, and Buffalo are all ahead of Utah in RPI right now...and ORU (214) isn't much below Utah.
This is why we (I use the term "we" based on comments made by others about your "analyses," not because I am their official spokesman) struggle with your opinions. You pick and choose what criteria fits your argument and, if none does, you make it anyway.
Savannah Jay wrote:I understand RPIs are raw...but it gives some very basic tool to compare teams that haven't played each other, right?
And since Butler had not beaten Indiana yet when the article was written and this discussion started, it is not germane to this part of the discussion. So prior to Butler's very huge win this weekend, both Creighton and Butler had 5 top 100 wins (whether you use KenPom or RPI)...but Creighton didn't lose to Indiana State (you can fill in the RPI and Ken Pom numbers...it doesn't really matter at this point because I know it's not good). So it's not really that unthinkable that someone not named Stever would put Creighton's resume a little bit ahead of Butler's before this past weekend, which is what the writer did in his article. And, as I stated in my earlier comments, had Butler topped Indiana State, they would have (in my opinion) a top 5 tournament resume even before the Indiana win.
And if you feel this passionate about it, write to the dude who wrote the article. Maybe he'll care.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 31 guests