Conference Realignment Thread v. 2016

The home for Big East hoops

Re: Conference realignment thread v. 2016

Postby kayako » Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:56 am

DudeAnon wrote:Can we all just agree that there are really only 4 realistic candidates? UCONN, UD, SLU, VCU? And only one of those would be added for reasons other than their basketball pedigree.


Ideally UD or SLU only when paired with UCONN. That'd set us up nicely with 6 teams on the coast and 6 teams in midwest. Without UCONN, the whole idea becomes meh at best.
supernova
User avatar
kayako
 
Posts: 3836
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 5:22 am

Re: Conference realignment thread v. 2016

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Conference Realignment Thread v. 2016

Postby Letsgonova » Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:49 pm

If we're talking about adding Dayton and St Louis, "meh" is an aspirational goal.

None of this is happening. Fox doesn't want it. The schools don't want it. The league doesn't need it. Stop.
Letsgonova
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2013 5:55 pm

Re: Conference Realignment Thread v. 2016

Postby DudeAnon » Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:44 pm

I think this season is going to be a perfect example of why JP is wrong on expansion.

Currently we have 4 teams playing for seeding and 4 trying to play their way in. The double-double ensures that 80% of all conference games will have 2 teams playing with NCAA implications. Ultimately, 6 is probably a max amount of bids. Because of this, those 4 teams fighting to get in are going to fight like hell and against good teams. Love it.
Xavier

2018 Big East Champs
User avatar
DudeAnon
 
Posts: 3013
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:52 pm

Re: Conference Realignment Thread v. 2016

Postby Bill Marsh » Mon Dec 19, 2016 4:25 pm

Letsgonova wrote:If we're talking about adding Dayton and St Louis, "meh" is an aspirational goal.

None of this is happening. Fox doesn't want it. The schools don't want it. The league doesn't need it. Stop.


What do you think Fox does want? Do you think they want expansion to bring in more eyeballs? If so, do you think they want big schools like VCU or UMass? Do they want the BE to push past the travel barrier for Gonzaga or BYU?
Bill Marsh
 
Posts: 4239
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:43 am

Re: Conference Realignment Thread v. 2016

Postby gtmoBlue » Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:26 pm

I think Fox wants a Partridge to fall out of the football Pear tree...in other words, Fox would prefer some chaos and a couple of so-called football five schools to get leftover by realignment.

I think they (Fox) were hoping for B-12 expansion...but since that didn't happen, they would probably like to see a bit of raiding. Change is good and Fox is possibly betting on more movement/raids. None of the middies move Fox's needle, but should another f5 raid occur (raid on the ACC or B-12) or OU & UT bolt the B-12 and the rest implode, Fox would probably recommend a couple of leftover candidates they favor for addition.

You did take note that only ESPN paid the B-12 to remain at 10 - Fox did not pay them a dime.
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." - Nicholas Klein (1918)
"Top tier teams rarely have true "down" years and find a way to stay relevant every year." - Adoraz

Creighton
User avatar
gtmoBlue
 
Posts: 2767
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 11:59 am
Location: Latam

Re: Conference Realignment Thread v. 2016

Postby Hall2012 » Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:58 pm

A lot of people are bashing St. Louis for the product they have on a floor today and it's true - they're terrible right now, but a small look ahead could give a better indication of what they may bring. Travis Ford has already been doing WORK on the recruiting trail, well on this way to bringing in Big East quality recruiting classes each of the next 2 years. For 2017, he has a pair of 4-star commits including F Hasahn French and G ESPN #56 Jordan Goodwin. He's follows that up in 2018 by already having a commitment from 5-star F ESPN #9 Cart'Are Gordon.

So he used both of his free 2017 scholarships and he still needs to recruit some depth for 2018, but that is a very solid core for him to build a team around.

I'm not saying we should add St. Louis (though I think they're a better candidate than most), just that I don't think the quality of this year's team is a very strong argument against them.
Seton Hall Pirates
Big East Tournament Champions: 1991, 1993, 2016
Big East Regular Season Champions: 1992, 1993, 2020
Hall2012
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 3:04 pm

Re: Conference Realignment Thread v. 2016

Postby whiteandblue77 » Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:48 pm

thats encouraging, other than dreaming of Notre Dame or Uconn wanting to join, i would love for the Billikens to get to the FF in the next 4 years so we grab them up on the next round of negotiations and be done! Ive given up on Dayton or St Joes ever breaking through their respective Big East border walls. BTW folks, DONT read gitmos posts while drinking in a bar during happy hour, might cause you to pick up a nervous twitch, cheers
The Big East is Dead! Long Live the Big East!
User avatar
whiteandblue77
 
Posts: 651
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:21 pm

Re: Conference Realignment Thread v. 2016

Postby Gopher+RamFan » Mon Dec 19, 2016 10:00 pm

Hall2012 wrote:A lot of people are bashing St. Louis for the product they have on a floor today and it's true - they're terrible right now, but a small look ahead could give a better indication of what they may bring. Travis Ford has already been doing WORK on the recruiting trail, well on this way to bringing in Big East quality recruiting classes each of the next 2 years. For 2017, he has a pair of 4-star commits including F Hasahn French and G ESPN #56 Jordan Goodwin. He's follows that up in 2018 by already having a commitment from 5-star F ESPN #9 Cart'Are Gordon.

So he used both of his free 2017 scholarships and he still needs to recruit some depth for 2018, but that is a very solid core for him to build a team around.

I'm not saying we should add St. Louis (though I think they're a better candidate than most), just that I don't think the quality of this year's team is a very strong argument against them.


Ford has always been a great recruiter. The knock against him was that he was a poor in game coach, the eventual reason for his firing at OSU. He will bring in enough good players that talent alone will be the reason they win A10 games. But this recruiting was to be expected, and he doesn't seem the type to turn down a decent P5 coaching offer if it ever presents itself. At least there's some excitement towards the future at SLU.
Gopher+RamFan
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 10:18 pm

Re: Conference Realignment Thread v. 2016

Postby Edrick » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:21 am

Hall2012 wrote:A lot of people are bashing St. Louis for the product they have on a floor today and it's true - they're terrible right now, but a small look ahead could give a better indication of what they may bring. Travis Ford has already been doing WORK on the recruiting trail, well on this way to bringing in Big East quality recruiting classes each of the next 2 years. For 2017, he has a pair of 4-star commits including F Hasahn French and G ESPN #56 Jordan Goodwin. He's follows that up in 2018 by already having a commitment from 5-star F ESPN #9 Cart'Are Gordon.

So he used both of his free 2017 scholarships and he still needs to recruit some depth for 2018, but that is a very solid core for him to build a team around.

I'm not saying we should add St. Louis (though I think they're a better candidate than most), just that I don't think the quality of this year's team is a very strong argument against them.


Look it up. SLU has been mostly terrible except for short oasises of 'alright' for generations.

SLU is NOT a good program. They just aren't. They've won freaking 5 NCAA Tournament games since 1952. Stop with the nonsense, Saint Louis sucks. Christ GW and St Joes are better options.

Expansion only occurs if UConn drops football. Expansion isn't happening - probably ever (or at least as long that it may as well be for the conversation)
User avatar
Edrick
 
Posts: 884
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:06 am

Re: Conference Realignment Thread v. 2016

Postby gtmoBlue » Tue Dec 20, 2016 1:53 pm

Not that I favor the Billikens, but they would boost up the middle tier for the foreseeable 4-6 years (and the old notion of a "travel partner"). Add a upper tier team if you can find one and call it a day at 12. SLU would add 2 W's to the upper and mid tier teams resumes. 2 more W's gets the 6th and maybe 7th team dancin'. Anyone for Siena, St Bonnie's, Holy Cross, Manhattan/Fordham? :lol:
;)

Question? What ever became of the notion to schedule 3-4 BE vs Zags games a year, rather than attempting to have them join the conference? No followup? No interest?
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." - Nicholas Klein (1918)
"Top tier teams rarely have true "down" years and find a way to stay relevant every year." - Adoraz

Creighton
User avatar
gtmoBlue
 
Posts: 2767
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 11:59 am
Location: Latam

PreviousNext

Return to Big East basketball message board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 26 guests