Jet915 wrote:If Seton Hall can win today, I say 6, otherwise, probably 5.
stever20 wrote:So I always look at a central question when I ask how many tourney bids a conference can get....
Would said team get in the tourney if they go 9-9 in conference play.
Why is this? Looking just at the Big East, Big 12, and AAC the 1 year they had 10- so 7 seasons....
6th place team has finished with more than 9 wins only once. Baylor last year. 2x that team finished with 8 wins.
Villanova proj OOC 12-1, add 9-9 that would be 21-10 Proj RPI 23.8. Easy lock
Creighton proj OOC 12-0, add 9-0 that would be 21-9 Proj RPI 32.9. Easy lock
Butler proj OOC 10-2, add 9-9 that would be 19-11 Proj RPI 30.1. Easy lock
Xavier proj OOC 10-3, add 9-9 that would be 19-12. Proj RPI 27.8. Easy lock
Providence proj OOC 11-2, add 9-9 that would be 20-11. Proj RPI 42.2. Easy lock
Seton Hall proj OOC 9-3, add 9-9 that would be 18-12. Proj RPI 49.6. Bubble but probable
Marquette proj OOC 9-3, add 9-9 that would be 18-12. Proj RPI 64.9. Bubble but doubtful
Georgetown proj OOC 8-5, add 9-9 that would be 17-14. Proj RPI 67.5. out
St John's Proj OOC 6-7, add 9-9 that would be 15-16. Proj RPI 102.8. out
DePaul proj OOC 8-4, add 9-9 that would be 17-13. Proj RPI 92.6. out
To me, 5 looks pretty likely as I think it's safe to say if any of the top 8 finish at 10-8(which every team who finished 5th got 10 wins)- they would make the tourney. To get a 6th looks pretty doubtful, unless Providence is the 6th place team. Maybe a Seton Hall can sneak in.
For those wondering about 7. 7th place teams in the 7 seasons have finished with 9 wins twice. So about 30% of the time.
GoldenWarrior11 wrote:In order for us to get 6 or 7 teams in, we really need the bottom of the league to struggle in conference play. DePaul and St. Johns appear likely to do just that, but I don't think Georgetown or Marquette are going to be easy outs at all.
I'd rather have us consistently get 5 teams in with high seeds, rather than 6 with middle seeds. We want deep runs for the teams that do make it.
GoldenWarrior11 wrote:In order for us to get 6 or 7 teams in, we really need the bottom of the league to struggle in conference play. DePaul and St. Johns appear likely to do just that, but I don't think Georgetown or Marquette are going to be easy outs at all.
I'd rather have us consistently get 5 teams in with high seeds, rather than 6 with middle seeds. We want deep runs for the teams that do make it.
JPSchmack wrote:GoldenWarrior11 wrote:In order for us to get 6 or 7 teams in, we really need the bottom of the league to struggle in conference play. DePaul and St. Johns appear likely to do just that, but I don't think Georgetown or Marquette are going to be easy outs at all.
I'd rather have us consistently get 5 teams in with high seeds, rather than 6 with middle seeds. We want deep runs for the teams that do make it.
I'm curious... why would the be an either or situation (5 with high seeds, 6 with middle seeds)? You're saying you want title contending programs at the top of the league more than a strong middle. And I don't think either is a problem for the Big East. You're always going to have a strong middle, and there hasn't been a problem with title contending programs at the top, either.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 24 guests