JohnW22 wrote:Is Myles Davis going to be on this list?
hoyahooligan wrote:http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-mock-draft/2017/
Last pick in the first round is still first round.
Pryor will be the leader of the team, and since I expect the Hoyas to be top 4 in the conference I expect him and peak to be on the top 2 teams.
BigmanU wrote:Hall2012 wrote:All are disrespected in the rating
44. Billy Garrett Jr. of DePaul
46. Marcus LoVett Jr. of St. John’s
37. Eric Paschall of Villanova
33. Haanif Cheatham of Marquette
31. Jalen Brunson of Villanova
For the record , I think some of the Georgetown players are rated to high
what has Govan (30) done to justify the rating?
why is Mulmore (28) so high?
TAMU Eagle wrote:BigmanU wrote:Hall2012 wrote:All are disrespected in the rating
44. Billy Garrett Jr. of DePaul
46. Marcus LoVett Jr. of St. John’s
37. Eric Paschall of Villanova
33. Haanif Cheatham of Marquette
31. Jalen Brunson of Villanova
For the record , I think some of the Georgetown players are rated to high
what has Govan (30) done to justify the rating?
why is Mulmore (28) so high?
I'd be happy to give you our thought process for each.
Billy Garrett Jr: As said in other posts, we were shocked when we ran the numbers and found out how low he was. Than we actually looked at this stats. He's an inefficient scorer, he doesn't rebound, his assist to turnover ratio is average at best, he doesn't create turnovers, he can't shoot the three. I challenge you to find a statistical reason why BGJ deserves a higher spot. His one positive stat was FTR, but even that dropped from elite levels his sophomore year to just good by his junior year. As the Depual fan in this thread said earlier, BGJ is consistently overrated because he is the best player on a bad team. It makes him seem better than he is. Very good freshman season but he never took the next step.
Marcus LoVett: He hasn't played a game yet. By all accounts, he's very good but he was a fringe top 100 recruit who redshirtted due to academics. Without any on the court experience to judge him by, we went by his rankings out of high school. He could certainly end up being better than his ranking but we have nothing to base that on.
Eric Paschall: High usage, low efficiency player from a bad Fordham team. He also has a shot selection problem. Shot a lot of threes and mid range jumpers despite not being accurate. He was also a poor defender. He has many great talents as well, for this response, I'm just listing what held him back.
Haanif Cheatham: As a Marquette fan, I watched a lot of Haanif. He will be an All Big East caliber player by the time he is a senior. He has a deadly first step and good finishing ability. He is very predictable on offense, he has almost no confidence when driving to his right and he doesn't have a pull up jumper. His moves at this point are to drive to the left all the way to the hoop, or catch and shoot a three. He also had a terrible handle last season, 2.7 turnovers per game.
Jalen Brunson: To be honest, I agree he's too low. When you have multiple people doing research on 50 players and trying to organize them, some can get lost in the shuffle. I think that was Brunson for us. What helped him back originally was that his raw numbers weren't great. Very efficient, but as the fifth starter he didn't put up as many points, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, etc that other players did. I don't think we properly weighed in the opportunity cost that Brunson faced with being on a team with so many talented players.
Jessie Govan: He had very good per 40 numbers. With more minutes he could be a monster in the post. Plus he's 6"10 and shot 50% from three, that is a dangerous weapon. I do find it funny that one Georgetown fan says he's too high and the other say he's too low. So inbetween the two must be the right spot, eh?
Jonathan Mulmore: As mentioned in the article, Mulmore was player we had the hardest time placing. He had eye popping numbers at Allegheny. He was 0.1 ppg away from leading the NJCAA in scoring. His usage was absurdly high, but despite that, he still had good efficiency. High efficiency + high usuage usually = superstar player. But how that translates into the Big East was an extremely tough question. We think Mulmore will be a pleasant surprise for Georgetown fans. Could absolutely be wrong.
BEhomer wrote:I thought the premise of this ranking was that each player in the ranking would be considered starting 5 on their respective teams. I don't see Darien Williams starting over Yakwe and Sima. I'm going to guess that Owens will see more time than Darien.
and is Gaston an automatic nod over Omara?
Mulmore and Pryor in the backcourt but then where does Peak and Campbell belong? With Brad Hayes back is Govan a guarantee to start?
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests