H.U.S.T.L.E. wrote:TheDon wrote:Is this a 100% done deal and or if the state repeals the law will they reconsider? I'm not a political person at all but it amazes me that anyone would allow this to get this far.
I think if it gets repealed they'd reconsider. But I don't know what the timetable is for that - from what I gather, the NC GOP isn't going to go quietly on it, so who knows.
Also, the ACC just announced they'll be moving all neutral site championships that were to be hosted in North Carolina (including football in Charlotte, with about 3 months notice!):
http://www.theacc.com/news/statements-from-the-atlantic-coast-conference-09-14-2016
TheDon wrote:Is this a 100% done deal and or if the state repeals the law will they reconsider? I'm not a political person at all but it amazes me that anyone would allow this to get this far.
admin wrote:
There are a lot of viable candidates for sure, but I suspect the NCAA will end up placing it a different ACC locale. One idea would be the place it in Dayton after the First Four.
I'm told by a prominent source inside the NCAA that the East region will get the replacement site, so some city along the East Coast is going to inherit first- and second-round games. North or south, it doesn't matter. That opens up a lot of possibilities, and there are plenty of good options out there. Neighboring South Carolina, which has three potential spots -- Greenville, Columbia, Charleston -- could be a good choice. Virginia/DC/Maryland have a few nice options as well.
A source told me that a half-dozen cities have already sent in requests to host, and that number should grow. There will be a formal bid process, but it will be extremely accelerated. Cities and potential venues have until Sept. 27 to put their name into the mix. The men's basketball selection committee will take less than two weeks to review all applications and then, on Friday, Oct. 7, the NCAA will announce which city will be awarded as Greensboro's replacement.
So, given this is a unique circumstance, the NCAA should take advantage and offer up a creative, memorable, one-time-only substitute. Philadelphia's representatives should be putting in a bid, and in doing so, allowing the NCAA to pick a spot synonymous not just with basketball, but with the history of college basketball and a place with a rich past of hosting NCAA Tournament games.
Philadelphia's The Palestra is one of college basketball's most historic venues.
The spot so many refer to as "the birthplace of college basketball" is the very best candidate for a replacement venue this season. No gym (other than Dayton's) has hosted more NCAA Tournaments than the Palestra's 14. But it's been two generations since the historic hoop house had hosting honors. The last time the Palestra was part of the tournament was in 1984, when it hosted three play-in games for teams vying for 11 and 12 seeds. It hasn't been part of the NCAA Tournament with full-site duties since '78.
Now's the perfect -- and probably only -- time to change that.
So why not take the opportunity to put the NCAA Tournament in such a historic venue? Philadelphia is one of the biggest, most passionate and knowledgeable basketball cities in America and this event would immediately sell out. It would create a high demand, and would offer up something of a throwback. The Palestra isn't going to qualify in normal bid cycles, so if this is a one-time-only scenario, the NCAA should think outside of the box and pay homage to the sport by selecting college basketball's version of the Vatican.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 19 guests