Big East Expansion Again!

The home for Big East hoops

Re: Big East Expansion Again!

Postby gtmoBlue » Sat Jul 30, 2016 9:05 pm

So...that means we've got a shot at WF and Duke when they drop football. Nice.
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." - Nicholas Klein (1918)
"Top tier teams rarely have true "down" years and find a way to stay relevant every year." - Adoraz

Creighton
User avatar
gtmoBlue
 
Posts: 2767
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 11:59 am
Location: Latam

Re: Big East Expansion Again!

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Big East Expansion Again!

Postby trephin » Sun Jul 31, 2016 11:57 am

billyjack wrote:In addition to what Jet said, the MAC several years ago had a similar arrangement with UMass (football in MAC, everything else in the A-10). Then just recently they told UMass they had to be either all in, or leave the MAC (new MAC rule?). That's why UMass is now independent in football, and still in the A-10. So their new conference rules wouldn't allow UConn to do this either.


The MAC didn't make a new rule; UMass was aware as part of their agreement with the MAC that if full membership was offered and declined, UMass would have to leave after two further years. I do think the MAC knew UMass wouldn't accept at that time and exercised the clause to reduce membership from 13 to 12 (remember Temple was still in MAC as football only when UMass was joining)
trephin
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 12:26 pm

Re: Big East Expansion Again!

Postby billyjack » Sun Jul 31, 2016 2:14 pm

trephin wrote:
billyjack wrote:In addition to what Jet said, the MAC several years ago had a similar arrangement with UMass (football in MAC, everything else in the A-10). Then just recently they told UMass they had to be either all in, or leave the MAC (new MAC rule?). That's why UMass is now independent in football, and still in the A-10. So their new conference rules wouldn't allow UConn to do this either.


The MAC didn't make a new rule; UMass was aware as part of their agreement with the MAC that if full membership was offered and declined, UMass would have to leave after two further years. I do think the MAC knew UMass wouldn't accept at that time and exercised the clause to reduce membership from 13 to 12 (remember Temple was still in MAC as football only when UMass was joining)


ok, thanks trephin
Providence
User avatar
billyjack
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4168
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: Providence

Previous

Return to Big East basketball message board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 30 guests