ChelseaFriar wrote:GoldenWarrior11 wrote:Boy, how would you feel if you were Florida State, UNC, Virginia, and/or Clemson? Maryland and Rutgers will be receiving over $42 million per year under the new B1G TV deal, and those schools won't even get half that in a given year. Over the course of 10 years, you're looking at a TV-revenue deficit of nearly $200 million. One would think that this could be the prologue of a UNC/Virginia/Georgia Tech/FSU defection to the B1G, and a NCST/VT move to the SEC.
It's a bit disturbing that Rutgers is getting that kind of money. In 11 years of living in Manhattan I think I've met one guy who cares about Rutgers football (and that was when they had Ray Rice - I'm guessing he no longer cares).
GoldenWarrior11 wrote:It's one thing to be an ACC team and be behind Rutgers and Maryland (a former conference mate) in TV revenue; it's another thing entirely to be UConn (and be a part of the American TV deal) and see Rutgers receiving close to $50 million more per year under the B1G Fox/eventual NBC deal.
The gap between the schools of power conferences and those of that from the Group of 5 schools is getting larger and larger each year. Other than Utah and TCU, no school from a non-power conference was "called-up" to the power conference-level - and those two schools brought consistent winning programs, won big BCS games before being invited, and finished a season in the top-5. No Group of 5 school, other than Boise State, has ever accomplished that feat.
I know the subject of UConn is a touchy one around here, and I'm not pushing one way or the other, but I just don't see how they will be able to continue to compete in football when all of their regional rivals are getting tens of millions of dollars annually and they are only getting pennies compared to them. Over the course of a 10-year stretch, that really adds up (literally).
ecasadoSBU wrote:ChelseaFriar wrote:GoldenWarrior11 wrote:Boy, how would you feel if you were Florida State, UNC, Virginia, and/or Clemson? Maryland and Rutgers will be receiving over $42 million per year under the new B1G TV deal, and those schools won't even get half that in a given year. Over the course of 10 years, you're looking at a TV-revenue deficit of nearly $200 million. One would think that this could be the prologue of a UNC/Virginia/Georgia Tech/FSU defection to the B1G, and a NCST/VT move to the SEC.
It's a bit disturbing that Rutgers is getting that kind of money. In 11 years of living in Manhattan I think I've met one guy who cares about Rutgers football (and that was when they had Ray Rice - I'm guessing he no longer cares).
You do realize the get 48-50k every football game?
That's pretty solid for a crappy program. They do have a lot of interest for Rutgers football. If they had a decent team they can draw a lot. New Jersey is not like NYC. They are willing to rally behind a college football team
DudeAnon wrote:250 mil for 25 college football games and 50 cbb games. If we guess that each cfb game is worth about 2 cbb games. That means that fox paid 2.5 million for each Big 10 basketball game. How is that even possible? That seems ridiculous.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], stever20 and 29 guests