stever20 wrote:I don't care. intangibles are something that is extremely hard to replace. I mean I saw a stat that in Archy's last 97 minutes of playing time, he's got 2 turnovers. He has 8 turnovers in the month of March- in 295 minutes. I'm not saying that they're going to suck or anything like that. But they are going to be a different group next year. Very different. I mean like Gottleib said, he hadn't seen a team all year long with the chemistry of Villanova. The pieces all fit this year. Will it next year? Maybe, but chemistry is no guarantee.
adoraz wrote:stever20 wrote:I don't care. intangibles are something that is extremely hard to replace. I mean I saw a stat that in Archy's last 97 minutes of playing time, he's got 2 turnovers. He has 8 turnovers in the month of March- in 295 minutes. I'm not saying that they're going to suck or anything like that. But they are going to be a different group next year. Very different. I mean like Gottleib said, he hadn't seen a team all year long with the chemistry of Villanova. The pieces all fit this year. Will it next year? Maybe, but chemistry is no guarantee.
Turning a positive thread about Nova's accomplishments into a negative thread about how 2 of their players are graduating.
This isn't Creighton losing Doug McDermott. It's Nova losing two leaders who will be replaced by Brunson, a 5 star recruit, and A10 rookie of the year. Last year they lost key players too, but they came back even stronger. Pinkston? Hilliard? Just off the top of my head...
You should also be concerned about 2017-18. Just think, if they have a successful season next year it could mean Brunson and the 5 star recruit go to the NBA!! Hart, Jenkins, and Reynolds will be graduating too!!! Now, replace Nova with literally any other good team and you'll see that everyone deals with turnover every year.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: stever20 and 7 guests