stever20 wrote:GreatDaneAttorney wrote:Interesting that Xavier and Marquette both announced Pac-12 matchups. Might still be some momentum behind the Pac-12/Big East scheduling alliance.
I doubt it. I think the Marquette/Utah one is a lot driven by Majerus.
If anything, I'd kind of think the other way- if they were going to do the challenge- they wouldn't have additional P12 games.
gtmoBlue wrote:stever20 wrote:GreatDaneAttorney wrote:Interesting that Xavier and Marquette both announced Pac-12 matchups. Might still be some momentum behind the Pac-12/Big East scheduling alliance.
I doubt it. I think the Marquette/Utah one is a lot driven by Majerus.
If anything, I'd kind of think the other way- if they were going to do the challenge- they wouldn't have additional P12 games.
Not so fast my man. It ain't necessarily so...
Take the Gavit's for example. Jays play Neb, Marquette plays Wiscy, Butler plays IUand/or Purdue - all annually. We still inked the Gavit Games as a conference. Just means 2 top tier games vs only 1.
I am optimistic that we shall see a BE/PAC12 Challenge - mainly as Fox will be driving the bus/airing the games. Jays already play ASU, so the fact that X and Marquette have scheduled a PAC-12 foe will not be a detriment to any potential Challenge game. It merely means that those named teams will play 2 PAC-12 teams. 2 seasons back Creighton played both ASU and Cal-Berkeley in a single season. No problem. Helps with the issue of upgrading the non-conference schedule as well. A good thing.
stever20 wrote:gtmoBlue wrote:Not so fast my man. It ain't necessarily so...
Take the Gavit's for example. Jays play Neb, Marquette plays Wiscy, Butler plays IUand/or Purdue - all annually. We still inked the Gavit Games as a conference. Just means 2 top tier games vs only 1.
I am optimistic that we shall see a BE/PAC12 Challenge - mainly as Fox will be driving the bus/airing the games. Jays already play ASU, so the fact that X and Marquette have scheduled a PAC-12 foe will not be a detriment to any potential Challenge game. It merely means that those named teams will play 2 PAC-12 teams. 2 seasons back Creighton played both ASU and Cal-Berkeley in a single season. No problem. Helps with the issue of upgrading the non-conference schedule as well. A good thing.
Big Difference is that all the ones you mention are local rivalries vs Big Ten schools. Also a huge difference is geography.
Also, Fox would not automatically get all the games- remember ESPN has a part of the Pac 12 TV deal as well...
Until Arizona and UCLA yield- there's going to be no challenge.
Hall2012 wrote:There's nothing official but Seton Hall could end up with a game @ a Pac12 school. They're playing KU in Hawaii and rumored to be looking for a 2nd game on their trip out west. No guarantee its a high major game, but with the Fox relationship a Pac12 opponent is certainly possible.
Either way, the Hall's OOC schedule is shaping up to be much improved with Kansas, a Gavitt Game, and a strong Advocare Invitational Field (Florida, Gonzaga, Miami, Stanford, Iowa State, Indiana State, Quinnipiac). The cupcake portion of the schedule remains to be seen- hopefully they can at least keep the majority of their weaker opponents in the top 200 this year.
Hall2012 wrote:There's nothing official but Seton Hall could end up with a game @ a Pac12 school. They're playing KU in Hawaii and rumored to be looking for a 2nd game on their trip out west. No guarantee its a high major game, but with the Fox relationship a Pac12 opponent is certainly possible.
Either way, the Hall's OOC schedule is shaping up to be much improved with Kansas, a Gavitt Game, and a strong Advocare Invitational Field (Florida, Gonzaga, Miami, Stanford, Iowa State, Indiana State, Quinnipiac). The cupcake portion of the schedule remains to be seen- hopefully they can at least keep the majority of their weaker opponents in the top 200 this year.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests