Bellarmine v. Marquette (non rev warning)

The home for Big East hoops

Re: Bellarmine v. Marquette (non rev warning)

Postby BillEsq » Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:00 pm

The announcer just introduced Marquette as the Warriors.
BillEsq
 
Posts: 812
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 6:30 pm

Re: Bellarmine v. Marquette (non rev warning)

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Bellarmine v. Marquette (non rev warning)

Postby MUSeashells&Balloons » Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:33 pm

BillEsq wrote:The announcer just introduced Marquette as the Warriors.

I like him.
Coach Al Mcguire:
"I like seashells and balloons, ribbons and medals, bare feet and wet grass."
"When I'm losing, they call me nuts. When I'm winning, they call me eccentric."
"Queen of victory, pray for us."
User avatar
MUSeashells&Balloons
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:38 am
Location: Denver, CO / Milwaukee, WI

Re: Bellarmine v. Marquette (non rev warning)

Postby yorost » Tue Apr 23, 2013 3:55 pm

Overtime, too bad Marquette timeout'd that goal early on. :lol:
User avatar
yorost
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:28 pm

Re: Bellarmine v. Marquette (non rev warning)

Postby yorost » Tue Apr 23, 2013 3:58 pm

Woot, guess Bellarmine isn't joining. :P Count me surprised on the win, Marquette is doing much better than I expected this season.
User avatar
yorost
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:28 pm

Re: Bellarmine v. Marquette (non rev warning)

Postby BillEsq » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:00 pm

Shocking ending to the Bellarmine season... ranked 20th then three out of four games with OT losses we will now need to win at Penn. Apparently we had some guys out with suspensions. Good win for Marquette- looks like you guys have some decent players.
BillEsq
 
Posts: 812
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 6:30 pm

Re: Bellarmine v. Marquette (non rev warning)

Postby BillEsq » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:01 pm

yorost wrote:Woot, guess Bellarmine isn't joining. :P Count me surprised on the win, Marquette is doing much better than I expected this season.



LOL don't make me cry...
BillEsq
 
Posts: 812
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 6:30 pm

Re: Bellarmine v. Marquette (non rev warning)

Postby trephin » Tue Apr 23, 2013 8:43 pm

Marquette definitely has performed better than expected but I do believe part of that is due to the number of transfers rather than the going with 100% non varsity players.

Without working the numbers, I would theorize that until the conference performs better top to bottom, that expanding beyond 6 or 7 would hurt schools (replacing non conference games with more weaker conference games). Again, I have no data to support this theory.

G'town never was the top team in the conference when it had Cuse and ND. I was offering an opinion that it was the top program in the new BE based on history. I do think SJU, PC, Nova are improving and will certainly make the conference championship an open race.

Bill, does Marquette or the rest of the conference really need a bridge? Are any of the schools riding buses to/from Marquette? Lacrosse doesn't play friday then someplace else on saturday. Is KY a growing lacrosse region? I'm just thinking that in relation to how the conference potentially will be setup, Bellarmine might be too far south whereas Fairfield (slightly larger school) is in a solid east coast lacrosse region.

I'm not associated with FU in any way, but I am a proponent of associated membership for them.

Does anyone think Rutgers would prefer indy or any other conference instead of the BE? I think the BE and Rutgers will stay together until AQs are insured for BE and/or B1G.
trephin
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 12:26 pm

Re: Bellarmine v. Marquette (non rev warning)

Postby BillEsq » Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:46 pm

yorost wrote:Woot, guess Bellarmine isn't joining. :P Count me surprised on the win, Marquette is doing much better than I expected this season.


I guess the Bellarmine loss was so devastating that the AD's decided that expanding to 12 teams was better than adding associates... :lol:
BillEsq
 
Posts: 812
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 6:30 pm

Re: Bellarmine v. Marquette (non rev warning)

Postby QueRico » Fri Apr 26, 2013 1:30 am

BillEsq wrote:
yorost wrote:Woot, guess Bellarmine isn't joining. :P Count me surprised on the win, Marquette is doing much better than I expected this season.


I guess the Bellarmine loss was so devastating that the AD's decided that expanding to 12 teams was better than adding associates... :lol:

:lol: :lol: :lol:
fwiw, Seton Hall Club Lacrosse played a short season for the 1st time in 20 years.
User avatar
QueRico
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:45 am

Re: Bellarmine v. Marquette (non rev warning)

Postby BillEsq » Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:03 am

QueRico wrote:
BillEsq wrote:
yorost wrote:Woot, guess Bellarmine isn't joining. :P Count me surprised on the win, Marquette is doing much better than I expected this season.


I guess the Bellarmine loss was so devastating that the AD's decided that expanding to 12 teams was better than adding associates... :lol:

:lol: :lol: :lol:
fwiw, Seton Hall Club Lacrosse played a short season for the 1st time in 20 years.



Really good for them. On a side note Que what are the odds you figure of Seton Hall adding non-rev sports such as lacrosse.
BillEsq
 
Posts: 812
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 6:30 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Big East basketball message board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests