Can't disagree with that logic. I would say Joe Davis is a close #2 guy. He was during cfb.stever20 wrote:MUPanther wrote:Joe Davis and Jim Jackson is a strong team. Bill Raftety is working on CBS on Saturday. BTN has 5 games on Saturday.
They may be a strong team, but isn't Gus Johnson, the clear #1 guy. The Butler/Xavier game is the clear #1 game on Saturday, but best guy isn't calling the game? Seems kind of strange to me. Heck, you could make the case that the best game has the #3 announcing group(I think Brando/Bahe would be #2 over Davis/Jackson).
stever20 wrote:Watson vs Indiana, Arizona St, Oklahoma- 18 ast 9 turnovers 3 to per game, 2-1 ast/to ratio
vs other 11 teams(none of which in the top 140- 73 ast 28 turnovers 2.60 ast/to ratio 2.5 turnovers per game
if you add St John's to the 3 good teams... 26 ast 14 turnovers 1.86 ast/to ratio- 3.5 to per game with bad games then 65 ast 23 turnovers 2.83 ast/to ratio, 2.3 to per game
against the good teams- he is turnover prone.
jln wrote:stever20 wrote:Watson vs Indiana, Arizona St, Oklahoma- 18 ast 9 turnovers 3 to per game, 2-1 ast/to ratio
vs other 11 teams(none of which in the top 140- 73 ast 28 turnovers 2.60 ast/to ratio 2.5 turnovers per game
if you add St John's to the 3 good teams... 26 ast 14 turnovers 1.86 ast/to ratio- 3.5 to per game with bad games then 65 ast 23 turnovers 2.83 ast/to ratio, 2.3 to per game
against the good teams- he is turnover prone.
It's pretty funny that you would look up those stats from those first three games and point out that he had 18 assists to 9 turnovers but choose not to disclose he was 16 to 4 in the Oklahoma and Arizona State games. Basically you just showed he was awful against Indiana.
It looks to me like the evidence thus far from this year would basically support that Watson has been good in games he's been good in and bad in games he's been bad in.
Jet915 wrote:We ready?
stever20 wrote:jln wrote:stever20 wrote:Watson vs Indiana, Arizona St, Oklahoma- 18 ast 9 turnovers 3 to per game, 2-1 ast/to ratio
vs other 11 teams(none of which in the top 140- 73 ast 28 turnovers 2.60 ast/to ratio 2.5 turnovers per game
if you add St John's to the 3 good teams... 26 ast 14 turnovers 1.86 ast/to ratio- 3.5 to per game with bad games then 65 ast 23 turnovers 2.83 ast/to ratio, 2.3 to per game
against the good teams- he is turnover prone.
It's pretty funny that you would look up those stats from those first three games and point out that he had 18 assists to 9 turnovers but choose not to disclose he was 16 to 4 in the Oklahoma and Arizona State games. Basically you just showed he was awful against Indiana.
It looks to me like the evidence thus far from this year would basically support that Watson has been good in games he's been good in and bad in games he's been bad in.
the thing with him for all the games.... his turnover rate is 19.8%. Last year it was 20.1%- for the entire season.
He was 8/5 vs St John's for gosh sakes. That's not good.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 10 guests