adoraz wrote:I predicted this to be the case, especially because USC/UCLA were rumored to not want to participate in a Big East - Pac 12 challenge a few years back.
As I've been saying, the Big East needs to at least be open to signing a contract with ESPN. There are some downsides for sure which need to be considered, but one potential major upside would be a challenge with the ACC.
stever20 wrote:adoraz wrote:I predicted this to be the case, especially because USC/UCLA were rumored to not want to participate in a Big East - Pac 12 challenge a few years back.
As I've been saying, the Big East needs to at least be open to signing a contract with ESPN. There are some downsides for sure which need to be considered, but one potential major upside would be a challenge with the ACC.
or even the SEC honestly. That's a pretty good conference there as well.
Great point about USC/UCLA- I had forgotten about that, but you're absolutely correct.
redmen9194 wrote:I think going back to ESPN would be a disaster. We would have games behind a paywall, we would be relegated to sharing scheduling with the other leagues. It would be a step down for sure. The deal with Fox is better exposure wise and game production wise. ESPN is just not as good. I think if we keep the Big XII set up that would be great. Don't really need an ACC challenge and I doubt they would do it.
adoraz wrote:GW11- I agree with most of your takes, but out of all major conferences the Pac is not only the worst (by a significant margin- it was the worst before UCLA/USC left) but also will almost certainly be dead or a G5 league around the time the challenge would start. It seems pretty likely the Big Ten will poach a few more teams and then the rest (besides Washington State / Oregon State) will go to the Big XII.
Just saying if Fox offers Pac 12 and ESPN offers ACC or SEC then those options wouldn't be remotely comparable.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests