DudeAnon wrote:
ChestRockwell85 wrote:Nothing but love for Xavier, but I mean come on, they weren't competing in the Old Big East for 13 out of the last 20 years. Was a lot harder to make the tournament going through that gauntlet every year.
GumbyDamnit! wrote:2010-11 vs P5/P6 conferences:
Big East = 32-19. 63% winning %
MVC = 11-25. 31% winning %
Wich St. 6-1; the rest of the MVC went 5-24. 20 games on H or neutral court; 16 away.
Had Creighton been in the BE they would have been bottom 3-4 IMO.
For perspective, X was pretty good that year. 15-1 in the A10. They lost to Cincy (7th place BE team) by 20 and Marq (9th place) by 11. They did beat SHU, who finished in 12th by 5 on a neutral court.
Xudash wrote:GumbyDamnit! wrote:2010-11 vs P5/P6 conferences:
Big East = 32-19. 63% winning %
MVC = 11-25. 31% winning %
Wich St. 6-1; the rest of the MVC went 5-24. 20 games on H or neutral court; 16 away.
Had Creighton been in the BE they would have been bottom 3-4 IMO.
For perspective, X was pretty good that year. 15-1 in the A10. They lost to Cincy (7th place BE team) by 20 and Marq (9th place) by 11. They did beat SHU, who finished in 12th by 5 on a neutral court.
On the flip side, X and PITT went at it - possibly in back to back years - with X coming out on top in 2010:
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/game?gameId=300800221
GumbyDamnit! wrote:Xudash wrote:GumbyDamnit! wrote:2010-11 vs P5/P6 conferences:
Big East = 32-19. 63% winning %
MVC = 11-25. 31% winning %
Wich St. 6-1; the rest of the MVC went 5-24. 20 games on H or neutral court; 16 away.
Had Creighton been in the BE they would have been bottom 3-4 IMO.
For perspective, X was pretty good that year. 15-1 in the A10. They lost to Cincy (7th place BE team) by 20 and Marq (9th place) by 11. They did beat SHU, who finished in 12th by 5 on a neutral court.
On the flip side, X and PITT went at it - possibly in back to back years - with X coming out on top in 2010:
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/game?gameId=300800221
Pitt was the epitome of March Sadness. They had some really good teams but often wilted when it counted most. Was never a fan of their style of play. Ugly basketball.
Xudash wrote:GumbyDamnit! wrote:2010-11 vs P5/P6 conferences:
Big East = 32-19. 63% winning %
MVC = 11-25. 31% winning %
Wich St. 6-1; the rest of the MVC went 5-24. 20 games on H or neutral court; 16 away.
Had Creighton been in the BE they would have been bottom 3-4 IMO.
For perspective, X was pretty good that year. 15-1 in the A10. They lost to Cincy (7th place BE team) by 20 and Marq (9th place) by 11. They did beat SHU, who finished in 12th by 5 on a neutral court.
On the flip side, X and PITT went at it - possibly in back to back years - with X coming out on top in 2010:
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/game?gameId=300800221
Hall2012 wrote:"In between those two years, though, it’s been pretty grim in Newark. No second weekends in the NCAA Tournament and the third worst recruiting performance can’t be a good sign."
Yup, pretty grim. Between those 2 years, SHU has only finished tied for 3rd in the Big East every time and never missed an NCAA Tournament. Is the lack of a sweet 16 appearance disappointing? Sure. And high school recruiting rankings are overrated - SHU consistently has players outperforming their rankings. But if 2 conference championships (1 tourney 1 rs) not missing an NCAA Tournament since 2015 is "grim," well then ouch for pretty much everyone other than Nova.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests