adoraz wrote:stever20 wrote:adoraz wrote:I agree it's unsustainable, but if it did sustain then only 5 teams would make the Dance (including Providence). 5/10 are 1-3 or worse in conference. What I expect to happen is Providence won't continue playing this well and won't make it, so then we'd be down to 4 teams. Then Marquette and one of Georgetown/Xavier will get to at least 8/9 wins and we'll get 6 teams in the Tournament.
Basically we still could get anywhere from 4-9 teams in. I think 6 is most likely, followed by 7, 5, 8, 4, 9.
I don't think there is a remotely possible scenario where only 4 teams would get in....
I don't either, which is why I put 4 as the second to least likely scenario... 4 and 9 (least likely) have probably a less than 1% chance at happening.
Stop nitpicking, please, otherwise I'll stop responding to your posts.
kayako wrote:6, 7, 5, 8 sounds about right, with others combining to less than 1% chance. I think 7-11 conference record isn't automatically NIT, as the bubble will inevitably weaken. Wed/Thur BET games are setting up to be huge.
2018 #1 seeded Xavier and #1 seeded Villanova combined to lose 6 games (1 in BET) to the other 8 schools. There's very small chance that all of SHU, Butler, and Nova keeping up the current pace.
stever20 wrote:The issue with the bubble this year is there's so many teams right now in play that someone has to get helped by games.
kayako wrote:stever20 wrote:The issue with the bubble this year is there's so many teams right now in play that someone has to get helped by games.
That is the bubble every year. It won't be too long before the bubble is reduced to the last 8 in/first 8 out. The conferences I'd be worried about is the WCC and the A10. I'm not sure I like BYU, SMC, and VCU's odds.
adoraz wrote:As I said, less than 1% for 4 bids. 0% would be 2 or 3 bids. 4 would happen if Seton Hall/Villanova/Butler/one other dominate and Providence wins a lot of games but ends up on the wrong side of the bubble. It'd be extremely unlikely but it absolutely is possible where the bottom half all ends up in the 4-14 through 8-10 range. Last year THIRD place was 9-9 (a 4 way tie) and we also had a far less dominate top half.
You're just nitpicking, which is why you agreed with the main part of my post but originally neglected to say that and chose to only focus on the smallest part that you could disagree with. At least we can agree on what is important, which is the rest of my post.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 44 guests