ArmyVet wrote:According to an article today out of the Hartford Courant, "there was a risk that the Big east deal would fall apart, as a prior one had a few years ago".
Details anyone?
scoscox wrote:Auriemma and Benedict have both said they tried to get back in before and the Big East told them no. What changed I think is the rest of the conferences going to twenty conference games.
GoldenWarrior11 wrote:What's hilarious to me is that so, so, so many AAC fans that proclaim excitement to finally get rid of UConn (whether in the form of their currently poor football program, or - in recent seasons - underachieving basketball program). However, it was because of UConn that the AAC got more money in their television contract than what C-USA was making (which is where nearly all the members had come from). Without UConn in 2013, the AAC is C-USA with Temple, making several thousand dollars annually on who knows which secondary networks. It was UConn that won all of the American's national championships. The AAC absolutely benefited immensely from their association with UConn (although UConn definitely saw a brand decrease from their association with the AAC). Even UConn's membership in the AAC was never sustainable, and UConn always was looking around for another conference, the AAC definitely saw its value increase thanks in large part to UConn. And, let's be totally honest, every member in the AAC would instantaneously leave every other member behind and out in the cold if it meant a golden ticket to the P5, no question. So were should the animosity and envy go towards? Probably not UConn...
SamElliott wrote:To be fair, there is not a team outside of the football 5 that wouldn't accept an invite. Even Marquette, if the ACC wanted to balance ND.
SamElliott wrote:The thing about the AAC (and this includes UConn currently), is that people bring it up for expansion because those are really the last viable teams that could credibly be picked up by the football 5. The members that were in CUSA (that are now in the AAC, ACC A10, BE, B12) rightly bolted from the lower class of that league.
SamElliott wrote:ESPN struck those deals due to the ratings they've gotten for football. The AAC was smart enough to realize that those ESPN spots they inherited after the old big east split were their biggest asset they got in the divorce. There was no way they were giving those up. Even more than the actual revenue, those guaranteed windows on linear ESPN are the bedrock of that contracts value.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 31 guests