GumbyDamnit! wrote:Man I'm trying really hard to understand why the X fans are chirping so much... Xuperman, Scosox, XUSandy. All predicting an easy waltz to the title for Team Snickers...I mean Musketeers.
Nova doesn't have the same amount of "talent" as X apparently. I'm curious as to what--other than your own biased opinions--is that is based on? I thought to myself that X has recruited fairly well I guess. Then I looked and noticed that in the last 4 recruiting cycles Nova has brought in 8 (actually 10, but 2 have since moved on) Top 100 players (24/7 Composite) and X brought in 4. And the 2 non-Top 100 players Nova brought in are actually starters for us anyway. Hmmm... recruiting doesn't explain it.
Maybe the confidence stems from past performance? Let's see... According to Kenpom Nova's average ranking over the last 6 years is 8.3; X is 33.0. Hmmmm...that can't be it.
Maybe conference performance will reveal the true story. Let's see... 6 years: Nova = 104-20; X = 73-48. Hmmm...That certainly doesn't explain it.
Oh, maybe head to head might be the reason for the optimism. Well Nova is 12-2 vs. X over the past 6 years. 86% winning %. Ouch...well that can't be it.
Maybe it's the coaching... Let's see Travis has an NIT win vs Toledo at Cintas and JW has 3 FF's, 2 NC's and an even an NIT Championship. Hmmm... well I'll admit that's a close one. But I'm going to give a slight edge to Jay just because he dresses a little better.
I'm struggling here... Oh wait, X has always been a great team come March. Aha! I think that might be it. OK, last 6 tourneys (well, 5 for X ). Nova is 18-4. X is 7-5. Hey, very respectable for X. They've got 3 wins vs single digit teams in the last 6 tourneys. Not bad. Oh wait, Nova has 10...yikes. That's not really close either.
I'm running out of things here...help me out guys...I must be missing something obvious.
So...we're just talking gut feeling here? Or maybe you guys went to one of those Tarot Card readers in Cincy and she was bullish on the XMen? I'm sure in your eyes KyKy is the missing piece but the Nova guys (who were all ranked well ahead of KyKy) will surely struggle to contribute. Q and Naji (did I spell that right?) are going to take big steps forward but Nova has never shown the ability to develop players over the years. So Bey, Samuels, DCR, Swider, Slater and Gilespie all regress?
Nothing wrong with an opinion...everyone's got one. But I'm hoping you can lay some advanced insight on us--that has you convinced of Nova's demise and X's ascension--other than just a "feeling" rooted in your own biased fandom. And quite honestly if you want to talk about overall team talent, I think PC, SHU,G'town, CU and Marq all can make a pretty good argument vs. X.
Hall2012 wrote:GumbyDamnit! wrote:Man I'm trying really hard to understand why the X fans are chirping so much... Xuperman, Scosox, XUSandy. All predicting an easy waltz to the title for Team Snickers...I mean Musketeers.
Nova doesn't have the same amount of "talent" as X apparently. I'm curious as to what--other than your own biased opinions--is that is based on? I thought to myself that X has recruited fairly well I guess. Then I looked and noticed that in the last 4 recruiting cycles Nova has brought in 8 (actually 10, but 2 have since moved on) Top 100 players (24/7 Composite) and X brought in 4. And the 2 non-Top 100 players Nova brought in are actually starters for us anyway. Hmmm... recruiting doesn't explain it.
Maybe the confidence stems from past performance? Let's see... According to Kenpom Nova's average ranking over the last 6 years is 8.3; X is 33.0. Hmmmm...that can't be it.
Maybe conference performance will reveal the true story. Let's see... 6 years: Nova = 104-20; X = 73-48. Hmmm...That certainly doesn't explain it.
Oh, maybe head to head might be the reason for the optimism. Well Nova is 12-2 vs. X over the past 6 years. 86% winning %. Ouch...well that can't be it.
Maybe it's the coaching... Let's see Travis has an NIT win vs Toledo at Cintas and JW has 3 FF's, 2 NC's and an even an NIT Championship. Hmmm... well I'll admit that's a close one. But I'm going to give a slight edge to Jay just because he dresses a little better.
I'm struggling here... Oh wait, X has always been a great team come March. Aha! I think that might be it. OK, last 6 tourneys (well, 5 for X ). Nova is 18-4. X is 7-5. Hey, very respectable for X. They've got 3 wins vs single digit teams in the last 6 tourneys. Not bad. Oh wait, Nova has 10...yikes. That's not really close either.
I'm running out of things here...help me out guys...I must be missing something obvious.
So...we're just talking gut feeling here? Or maybe you guys went to one of those Tarot Card readers in Cincy and she was bullish on the XMen? I'm sure in your eyes KyKy is the missing piece but the Nova guys (who were all ranked well ahead of KyKy) will surely struggle to contribute. Q and Naji (did I spell that right?) are going to take big steps forward but Nova has never shown the ability to develop players over the years. So Bey, Samuels, DCR, Swider, Slater and Gilespie all regress?
Nothing wrong with an opinion...everyone's got one. But I'm hoping you can lay some advanced insight on us--that has you convinced of Nova's demise and X's ascension--other than just a "feeling" rooted in your own biased fandom. And quite honestly if you want to talk about overall team talent, I think PC, SHU,G'town, CU and Marq all can make a pretty good argument vs. X.
C'mon Gumby, they're returning 4 starters from their NIT team! That's big stuff!! I don't know how anyone else will be able to keep up!
GumbyDamnit! wrote:Man I'm trying really hard to understand why the X fans are chirping so much... Xuperman, Scosox, XUSandy. All predicting an easy waltz to the title for Team Snickers...I mean Musketeers.
Nova doesn't have the same amount of "talent" as X apparently. I'm curious as to what--other than your own biased opinions--is that is based on? I thought to myself that X has recruited fairly well I guess. Then I looked and noticed that in the last 4 recruiting cycles Nova has brought in 8 (actually 10, but 2 have since moved on) Top 100 players (24/7 Composite) and X brought in 4. And the 2 non-Top 100 players Nova brought in are actually starters for us anyway. Hmmm... recruiting doesn't explain it.
Maybe the confidence stems from past performance? Let's see... According to Kenpom Nova's average ranking over the last 6 years is 8.3; X is 33.0. Hmmmm...that can't be it.
Maybe conference performance will reveal the true story. Let's see... 6 years: Nova = 104-20; X = 73-48. Hmmm...That certainly doesn't explain it.
Oh, maybe head to head might be the reason for the optimism. Well Nova is 12-2 vs. X over the past 6 years. 86% winning %. Ouch...well that can't be it.
Maybe it's the coaching... Let's see Travis has an NIT win vs Toledo at Cintas and JW has 3 FF's, 2 NC's and an even an NIT Championship. Hmmm... well I'll admit that's a close one. But I'm going to give a slight edge to Jay just because he dresses a little better.
I'm struggling here... Oh wait, X has always been a great team come March. Aha! I think that might be it. OK, last 6 tourneys (well, 5 for X ). Nova is 18-4. X is 7-5. Hey, very respectable for X. They've got 3 wins vs single digit teams in the last 6 tourneys. Not bad. Oh wait, Nova has 10...yikes. That's not really close either.
I'm running out of things here...help me out guys...I must be missing something obvious.
So...we're just talking gut feeling here? Or maybe you guys went to one of those Tarot Card readers in Cincy and she was bullish on the XMen? I'm sure in your eyes KyKy is the missing piece but the Nova guys (who were all ranked well ahead of KyKy) will surely struggle to contribute. Q and Naji (did I spell that right?) are going to take big steps forward but Nova has never shown the ability to develop players over the years. So Bey, Samuels, DCR, Swider, Slater and Gilespie all regress?
Nothing wrong with an opinion...everyone's got one. But I'm hoping you can lay some advanced insight on us--that has you convinced of Nova's demise and X's ascension--other than just a "feeling" rooted in your own biased fandom. And quite honestly if you want to talk about overall team talent, I think PC, SHU,G'town, CU and Marq all can make a pretty good argument vs. X.
GumbyDamnit! wrote:https://images.app.goo.gl/sKrQdFVbNVsYxiVf9
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 8 guests