Hall2012 wrote:stever20 wrote:If Memphis had beaten Texas Tech, they would have been end of the year 22-12 with 3 Q1 wins and a top 40 NET. Sorry but a resume like that last year with the win over Texas Tech- they'd have gotten in. Especially with how close they were with Cincy and Houston late in the season.....
The problem you are making is you want to look back at UConn 15-20 years ago. The problem is the AAC wasn't around then. All we have to look at are these 6 years- and even really moreso only last 5 years after all the moves got finished. That UConn has not been strong at all. That's the UConn that we have to evaluate in terms of how it's going to impact the AAC on the floor. If the AAC was only getting 2-3 teams in with UConn being one of them, dominating the conference, then what you're saying would be spot on. But the fact of the matter is that has not been the case at all whatsoever. The average Ken Pom rating last 5 years for UConn has been 94.4. You say that's not fair, that includes the 17-18 season where they were putrid. That's fair. But then you have to consider the outlier the other way of the 2015-16 season where they finished 25-11.... But you take those other 3 years- and the average is 89. That's the UConn that the league is losing.
And if the Raptors lost game 7 to the Sixers they'd have gotten nowhere near the NBA title. Everyone has close games, it's a stupid argument.
scoscox wrote:Cintas hung around 95% capacity per year in the a-10. It holds 10,200 (10800 standing room only)or something close to that and depending on the year we’d average anywhere from 9800 to full sellouts. It’s always been full. It’s definitely been amped up since we moved to the big east though. The last three years we’ve averaged over 100% capacity on the year. More or less every conference game is standing room only now and something like the top 20 most attended games ever are either uc or a big east team.
GumbyDamnit! wrote:Winners - The college BB fan. We'll see how Hurley makes out long term but make no mistake about it UConn is a BB school. And that makes 11 institutions all focused on the one sport that we all love. And give me 20 more highly competitive games on FS1, in crystal clear HD national broadcasts, instead of 20 cupcakes. Add in the old rivalries and I'm good to go.
It's not a conference of schools who are looking to be somewhere else. We know who we are, we embrace it and all of our resources are pointed in the same direction. You Husky BB fans will enjoy the hoops discussion on the board. There will be occasional spats (mostly the in-fighting between various St. John's fans with each other ) but we mostly pull for each other because we recognize that the BE is the last non FB power BB conference out there.
Loser - Stever. Anyone trying to peddle that this is actually "fine" for a conference like the AAC to lose it's historically top program is laughable.
DanofXav76 wrote:The Big East is the big winner here. As an X fan I'd be more worried if Villanova, with their two NC's in three years and total domination of the league since the reboot six seasons ago has already set the bar as high as possible. If the reports are accurate that Hurley has UCONN positioned for a rise to greatness in two years, it should help prevent what happened last year when both Nova and X were down a bit. I firmly believe adding the Huskies will put the BE in a position to challenge the ACC and the Big Ten as one of the best basketball conferences year in an year out. As fans isn't this what we're looking for?
billyjack wrote:Posters on the AAC boards (and some other football boards) either have a disconnect, or cannot process the English language, or are complete imbeciles... cuz they refuse to think about an issue from a different perspective than their own.
i mean, c'mon, it's been repeated to these dimwits a thousand freakin times that a great majority of the UConn fanbase may prefer getting back to their roots, re-establishing old rivalries, and getting back to the BET in Madison Square Garden.
DanofXav76 wrote:The Big East is the big winner here. As an X fan I'd be more worried if Villanova, with their two NC's in three years and total domination of the league since the reboot six seasons ago has already set the bar as high as possible. If the reports are accurate that Hurley has UCONN positioned for a rise to greatness in two years, it should help prevent what happened last year when both Nova and X were down a bit. I firmly believe adding the Huskies will put the BE in a position to challenge the ACC and the Big Ten as one of the best basketball conferences year in an year out. As fans isn't this what we're looking for?
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 45 guests