The Scope of the Scandal
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2017 3:44 pm
Adidas is at the heart of what we know already, because they're the source of the $$$, right? So who here thinks Adidas has spent no more $$$ on this scheme than was revealed in the indictments? And who here thinks that Nike and Under Armor have just been sitting by and watching Adidas gain competitive advantage over them during the past few years? Don't be naive!
Pat Forde said in an interview today that any coach/school that has landed a top 50 recruit recently had better have a darn good explanation for how they landed that recruit. If Nike and/or UnderArmor have similar schemes going, which seems very likely, then maybe we're even talking about half or more of the top 50 recruits having offers made to them. And to what extent will the kids themselves be blamed for "monetizing" their talent as soon as they can, vs. the coaches, the universities, shoe company execs, or agents?
IMHO, this ugly, ugly situation will cause a seismic shift in the landscape of men's college basketball, and probably in college football, and maybe in all of college sports and the structure of the NCAA itself. Fearless Prediction #1: the Big East will turn out to have a lot less dirty laundry than any other top 7 league. Hey, I'm hereby generously including the AAC in my list of the top leagues --so here's a hearty welcome to suspects like UConn, Cincy, Houston, SMU, etc. Some Big East schools will also be included in anyone's list of D1 programs with at least wee bit of explaining to do, and I can only hope we're clean.
Fearless Prediction #2: At least 20 universities will turn out to have been at least marginally involved in some bribery scheme related to college basketball, including at least a third of those who have made the Final Four since 2010. Grab yourselves a cold one, friends, and get ready to watch a true bloodbath; this is all going to be a fascinating show, albeit in a sick sort of way.
Pat Forde said in an interview today that any coach/school that has landed a top 50 recruit recently had better have a darn good explanation for how they landed that recruit. If Nike and/or UnderArmor have similar schemes going, which seems very likely, then maybe we're even talking about half or more of the top 50 recruits having offers made to them. And to what extent will the kids themselves be blamed for "monetizing" their talent as soon as they can, vs. the coaches, the universities, shoe company execs, or agents?
IMHO, this ugly, ugly situation will cause a seismic shift in the landscape of men's college basketball, and probably in college football, and maybe in all of college sports and the structure of the NCAA itself. Fearless Prediction #1: the Big East will turn out to have a lot less dirty laundry than any other top 7 league. Hey, I'm hereby generously including the AAC in my list of the top leagues --so here's a hearty welcome to suspects like UConn, Cincy, Houston, SMU, etc. Some Big East schools will also be included in anyone's list of D1 programs with at least wee bit of explaining to do, and I can only hope we're clean.
Fearless Prediction #2: At least 20 universities will turn out to have been at least marginally involved in some bribery scheme related to college basketball, including at least a third of those who have made the Final Four since 2010. Grab yourselves a cold one, friends, and get ready to watch a true bloodbath; this is all going to be a fascinating show, albeit in a sick sort of way.