milksteak wrote:I'll go ahead and finish off this thread for everyone. We'll start with Stever's post, which was nothing more than a suggestion that the Big East will lose Leitao, Mullin, Wright and Ewing to retirement within the next couple of year.
HLOH poster: "Yes, those four are old, but I think they've still got a while. And by the time they retire, a suitable replacement will be found."
Stever: "There's no telling that Villanova's success will continue when Wright retires. The Big East as a league relies heavily on Villanova to succeed as a league. The league could crash and burn when he retires. I'd hate to see it as a Big East fan, but it could totally happen. And the AAC inevitably will be better."
HLOH poster: "Villanova and Georgetown have rich basketball cultures, and they will be fine. St. John's is on the rise and DePaul has had some positive momentum. No reason for doom and gloom yet, especially since all of these guys are years away from retirement."
Stever: "All of those programs could very well be blindsided like Oklahoma was today. And they could very well be hosed when they retire. And when that happens, the AAC will be better."
HLOH poster: "Every program at some point faces this problem. People don't live forever. The very same problem could very well face SMU and UC before long."
Stever: "SMU and UC have great programs, and they are bigger than Jankovich and Cronin."
No, I'm saying that to count on guys that have been at their programs as long as Wright and even some of the others like Mack have to be there for 10-15 years- is just unrealistic.
And also, any coaching change has it's risks. I mean, look at St John's. They had a few bad coaches, and they're trended south for 15 years. There is no guarantee when hiring a new coach. NONE.