Page 1 of 2

AP Poll 11/28/2016

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:13 pm
by Hoya Hoya Hoya
AP Poll:
#2 Villanova
#7 Xavier
#10 Creighton
#18 Butler

http://collegebasketball.ap.org/poll

2016-2017 AP/Coaches Polls

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:14 pm
by milksteak
Week 4:

AP:
#2 - Villanova
#7 - Xavier
#10 - Creighton
#18 - Butler

Re: 2016-2017 AP/Coaches Polls

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:23 pm
by Edrick

Re: 2016-2017 AP/Coaches Polls

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:23 pm
by stever20
Not too bad. It'll be 7 vs 9 on Saturday for Xavier. Huge test for them.

for record- no one else got any votes. Totally understandable.

Re: AP Poll 11/28/2016

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:27 pm
by dakphonics
This is collectively the best showing the conference has had in the AP top 25 since it was formed. Last year Week 7 was pretty good too.

2016 Week 7:
Xavier #6
Butler #9
Providence #10
Nova #17

This week is slightly better with Villanova being at #2, 3 conference mates still in the top 10, and Butler being as high as 18. This is just the 7th week since the league reconstituted itself that 4 teams have been ranked at the same time. Also how about the Big East Expansion Teams Creighton, Butler, and Xavier... I think a lot of fans from the holdover teams didn't expect that besides Nova these 3 would represent the conference in the AP poll the most often 3 years in. Here is a list of all the teams in the conference and the number of weeks they've been represented in the AP poll since the league reconstituted itself:

Nova: 58 Weeks
Xavier: 21 Weeks
Butler: 20 Weeks
Creighton: 16 Weeks
Providence: 14 Weeks
Georgetown: 5 Weeks
St. Johns: 5 Weeks
Seton Hall: 4 Weeks
Marquette: 4 Weeks
DePaul: 0 Weeks

Re: AP Poll 11/28/2016

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 2:02 pm
by milksteak
dakphonics wrote:I think a lot of fans from the holdover teams didn't expect that besides Nova these 3 would represent the conference in the AP poll the most often 3 years in.


I certainly didn't. Going into the Big East in 2013, I expected Marquette and Georgetown to be the torchbearers of this conference for the foreseeable future.

Re: AP Poll 11/28/2016

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:50 pm
by indienapolis
Definitely didn't expect it for Butler, especially given their tumultuous coaching situation their first two years, but it's not entirely surprising for the three new teams to see this much success either. You essentially gave three ascendent programs the recruiting draw they were all missing in their former conferences. Now it's paying dividends.

Re: AP Poll 11/28/2016

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 6:41 pm
by Bill Marsh
indienapolis wrote:Definitely didn't expect it for Butler, especially given their tumultuous coaching situation their first two years, but it's not entirely surprising for the three new teams to see this much success either. You essentially gave three ascendent programs the recruiting draw they were all missing in their former conferences. Now it's paying dividends.


Two words . . .

Chris Holtmann

Re: AP Poll 11/28/2016

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 7:10 pm
by indienapolis
Bill Marsh wrote:
indienapolis wrote:Definitely didn't expect it for Butler, especially given their tumultuous coaching situation their first two years, but it's not entirely surprising for the three new teams to see this much success either. You essentially gave three ascendent programs the recruiting draw they were all missing in their former conferences. Now it's paying dividends.


Two words . . .

Chris Holtmann


In Butler's case, absolutely!

Re: AP Poll 11/28/2016

PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:54 pm
by HoosierPal
Hmmm. Three out of the four ranked teams are newbies from the Midwest. Time to rebrand as the Big MidWest?