Welcome to The Holy Land of Hoops

Seriously, no matter what we do this tournament the two most overrated conferences are easily those two.

I'd hold off calling other conferences overrated until this weekend is over. Number of sweet sixteen teams is what defines the best conferences. After that it's about getting lucky/hot and being ridiculously good.

having 7 teams each is one thing, but none below 8 seed? and the only reason why they don't have more teams drop is because they got to play 15 16 seeded teams.

ProvidenceNJ wrote:I'd hold off calling other conferences overrated until this weekend is over. Number of sweet sixteen teams is what defines the best conferences. After that it's about getting lucky/hot and being ridiculously good.

WVU, Baylor, Texas, Tech

Cal, USC, CU, UA, OSU

All loses to lower seeds. Losing to two #1 seeds isn't a sign of being overrated.

NJRedman wrote:

ProvidenceNJ wrote:I'd hold off calling other conferences overrated until this weekend is over. Number of sweet sixteen teams is what defines the best conferences. After that it's about getting lucky/hot and being ridiculously good.

WVU, Baylor, Texas, Tech

Cal, USC, CU, UA, OSU

All loses to lower seeds. Losing to two #1 seeds isn't a sign of being overrated.

Also, I wouldn't be so quick to base those calls on one or two years of results. We should be better than everyone who calls the Big East overrated just because Nova shit the bed the last two years.

When I was checking out the Kansas board yesterday (as the Big 12 losses were piling up), posters were basically saying that it was going to be up to Kansas to carry the league (again). The ACC is the best basketball conference.