Welcome to The Holy Land of Hoops

Team sheets

The committee often refers to "team sheets" when comparing team performance. The team sheets contain in-depth team information about strength of schedule, performance against top-50 teams and home/road records.

Q. The Kenpom analytic service that a lot of coaches use to evaluate teams, I'm curious if that's part of your discussion at all. There's some dramatic swings in what a team's RPI is and what a teams Kenpom number is. I wonder if the Committee is aware of those situations.

RON WELLMAN: To me, the Committee is very aware of everything. The Committee looks at every piece of data that we can put our hands on.

Kenpom, RPI, all that data, we have a list of data points that we can use. Sagarin, the LRNC, it just goes on and on.

Various Committee members will emphasize and use that data to various degrees. Some of them will reply on certain data more than others. So it just depends upon the Committee member.

This process can be very subjective. Certain Committee members will value certain pieces of data more than others. All of that information is available and easily accessible by the Committee members.

The selection committee only selects the 36 teams who receive at-large bids. Though each conference receives only one automatic bid, the selection committee may select any number of at-large teams from each conference. The at-large teams generally come from college basketball's top conferences, including the ACC, The American, Atlantic-10, Big 12, Big East, Big Ten, Conference USA, Mountain West, Pac-12, and SEC. Many of these at-large teams, however, are "on the bubble", meaning their chances of gaining a tournament berth are borderline, and they will not know if they have gained entry until the Selection Sunday bracket announcements.

The RPI rating is often considered a factor in selecting and seeding the final few teams in the tournament field. However, the NCAA selection committee in 2015 said the RPI is no longer relevant only utilized for grouping the teams into groups such as top 50 and top 100 teams to value the wins and losses and not as a factor for selection.

Additionally, the committee officially considers other computer rankings such as ESPN's BPI, Sagarin, and Pomeroy Ratings which use additional factors considered by the committee such as injured players in the case of the BPI.

Additionally, committee members consider how teams do on the road and at neutral courts, strength of conference and schedule, non-conference strength of schedule, record against other selected tournament teams, and other extenuating factors. Finally, the "eye test" is often quoted by pundits as something the committee uses, however NCAA.org's sparse description of the selection process doesn't officially mention the "eye test".

‏@JonRothstein
Syracuse will be evaluated for the NCAA Tournament based on what it will have shown under Jim Boeheim, per the NCAA.

stever20 wrote:
I think 2 things are really interesting...
1- the part about player and coach availability. Syracuse may get somewhat of a pass for Boeheim being out...

ChelseaFriar wrote:

stever20 wrote:
I think 2 things are really interesting...
1- the part about player and coach availability. Syracuse may get somewhat of a pass for Boeheim being out...

That's pretty bad considering it was the NCAA that punished him

That said, if they are getting a pass for cheating, I damn well hope PC gets a pass on the DePaul loss for only getting 14 minutes out of Bentil. But that probably won't happen...

Fieldhouse Flyer wrote:It appears that Zach Braziller tweeted a premature 'final' list. To wit:

Michael Yam ‏@Mike_Yam - 45 minutes ago

The final 68 according to the NCAA #MockSelection. There are 7 #pac12 teams included. Notable missing UW.



Butler moved up to # 42, and the final at-large place (# 46) was taken from LSU and given to St. Bonaventure.