Tom Crean and Buzzy Williams
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2015 2:24 am
Good coaches? Or okay coaches who were in a good situation.
I view Marquette as one of those coaching situations where an average coach can be viewed as very good. Such strong institutional support. And when Crean took over the c-usa was a solid platform and the big east invite only made it better. I did think Crean was solid though. I never thought much of buzz Williams, thought he was a clown who lucked into a great job.
Some jobs are easier to succeed at. I don't think xavier simply hires geniuses every time, I think it's a good job. Same with villanova, as Steve lappas had three top ten teams in his nine years on the main line. How come butker' guys always seem to work out? Craig Esherick made a sweet 16. Is kevin Ollie a phenom, or did he take over something great? WHen is the last time Ohio state has had a bad coach?
Other jobs, on the other hand, are just dead ends. I always thought you could put dean smith at rutgers and he would have been fired in five years, never to find a legitimate job again. Coaches don't leave Boston college, they get fired.
And then there are some on the fence jobs. Ed Cooley versus Tim welsh. Tommy amaker or Louis Orr versus Bobby gonzalez or kevin Williard. I have always considered st John's one of the most attractive jobs in the nation, but a decade and a half of mediocre to poor teams makes one wonder. Schools like Illinois, or Iowa, or George Washington, or Mississippi state, they can go either way. Makes you think a guy like Archie miller at dayton actually might be a real program builder. Ben Howland at ucla was under appreciated.
I view Marquette as one of those coaching situations where an average coach can be viewed as very good. Such strong institutional support. And when Crean took over the c-usa was a solid platform and the big east invite only made it better. I did think Crean was solid though. I never thought much of buzz Williams, thought he was a clown who lucked into a great job.
Some jobs are easier to succeed at. I don't think xavier simply hires geniuses every time, I think it's a good job. Same with villanova, as Steve lappas had three top ten teams in his nine years on the main line. How come butker' guys always seem to work out? Craig Esherick made a sweet 16. Is kevin Ollie a phenom, or did he take over something great? WHen is the last time Ohio state has had a bad coach?
Other jobs, on the other hand, are just dead ends. I always thought you could put dean smith at rutgers and he would have been fired in five years, never to find a legitimate job again. Coaches don't leave Boston college, they get fired.
And then there are some on the fence jobs. Ed Cooley versus Tim welsh. Tommy amaker or Louis Orr versus Bobby gonzalez or kevin Williard. I have always considered st John's one of the most attractive jobs in the nation, but a decade and a half of mediocre to poor teams makes one wonder. Schools like Illinois, or Iowa, or George Washington, or Mississippi state, they can go either way. Makes you think a guy like Archie miller at dayton actually might be a real program builder. Ben Howland at ucla was under appreciated.