thunderbird wrote:Seton Hall/Butler saw a benefit playing Saint Louis. No BE schools see a benefit playing Dayton. It's that simple.
kayako wrote:thunderbird wrote:Seton Hall/Butler saw a benefit playing Saint Louis. No BE schools see a benefit playing Dayton. It's that simple.
Xavier's probably just ignoring them. But I can see a H&H series happening with a BE team if AG can keep them dominating A10 for a good stretch. Oh wait nvm, we're going to 20 conference games and these kind of agreements are much less likely going forward.
Xudash wrote:Drop “probably” and you nailed it.
kayako wrote:Xudash wrote:Drop “probably” and you nailed it.
As a college bb fan, I'd like to see Ohio's "crossroads classic". As a BE fan, meh whatevers.
Xudash wrote:It also would screw up the Crosstown Shootout with UC. VD is where it belongs: with LossSalle and St. Joe’s.
kayako wrote:Xudash wrote:It also would screw up the Crosstown Shootout with UC. VD is where it belongs: with LossSalle and St. Joe’s.
Unless I am missing something, Indiana and Purdue don't play each other in the classic either. So in this hypothetical event, Xavier would only end up playing OSU & Dayton. And I thought it was Holtmann that brought it up.
kayako wrote:Xudash wrote:Drop “probably” and you nailed it.
As a college bb fan, I'd like to see Ohio's "crossroads classic". As a BE fan, meh whatevers.
SamElliott wrote:kayako wrote:Xudash wrote:Drop “probably” and you nailed it.
As a college bb fan, I'd like to see Ohio's "crossroads classic". As a BE fan, meh whatevers.
- As a #1 seed in the NCAA tournament, has it hit anyone yet that Dayton was always the better choice to be the NBE's 11th team?
- Perhaps UConn could have been the 12th team?
- The Fox Sports 1 contract allowed for 2 pro-rata shares to get to 12 teams (at 4 million per year for each team.)
- That extra inventory would increase the bargaining position of the league in 6 years. It's absurd not to get that last 4 million dollar share, as it adds equity to a fledgling league.
- Dayton has showed that they don't need the NBE to get a #1 seed.
- OTOH, UConn was an opening day qualifier in the AAC tournament, as Hurley didn't win 20 games this year.
- Let's also look at having a quality team in Ohio.
- After losing to DePaul, Travis Steele was about to make his second NIT in two years.
- Having Dayton to shoulder some of the load would be good for Xavier.
- As an aside, Dayton plays FCS football, and the NBE may want to consider sponsoring football on the FCS level. (UConn, Nova, Georgetown, Butler, and Dayton would be a solid core)
SamElliott wrote:kayako wrote:Xudash wrote:Drop “probably” and you nailed it.
As a college bb fan, I'd like to see Ohio's "crossroads classic". As a BE fan, meh whatevers.
- As a #1 seed in the NCAA tournament, has it hit anyone yet that Dayton was always the better choice to be the NBE's 11th team?
- Perhaps UConn could have been the 12th team?
- The Fox Sports 1 contract allowed for 2 pro-rata shares to get to 12 teams (at 4 million per year for each team.)
- That extra inventory would increase the bargaining position of the league in 6 years. It's absurd not to get that last 4 million dollar share, as it adds equity to a fledgling league.
- Dayton has showed that they don't need the NBE to get a #1 seed.
- OTOH, UConn was an opening day qualifier in the AAC tournament, as Hurley didn't win 20 games this year.
- Let's also look at having a quality team in Ohio.
- After losing to DePaul, Travis Steele was about to make his second NIT in two years.
- Having Dayton to shoulder some of the load would be good for Xavier.
- As an aside, Dayton plays FCS football, and the NBE may want to consider sponsoring football on the FCS level. (UConn, Nova, Georgetown, Butler, and Dayton would be a solid core)
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 10 guests