GumbyDamnit! wrote:I am no fan of throwing shade at a bunch of young kids who work hard to improve their games and represent their schools and this conference we all love. This is especially true when fans of a certain program start puffing out their chests as if their team is the 2nd coming of the 2015-2018 Villanova Wildcats. I have to remind myself that these kids should not be the ones targeted b/c of some internet douche-baggery.
Let's try to be honest and constructive here... In order for Q and Naji to become great players, instead of just good players, they need to improve their shooting. Naji and Q threw up around 300+ 3's last year combined at a less than 29% clip. That's just not good enough for a guard or a wing, or for any aspirations for being considered as one of the best players in the league. Yes, other parts of their games are good to very good. So I think X could legitimately compete for a BE title if those two guys are able to significantly improve that one area. If they don't, all the behind the back passes, and chest pumping after alley-oops will be fun to see but won't lead to actual wins.
Now conversely I think Paul Scruggs might be the one that emerges and is recognized as the best player on that roster. The kid has the most complete game, and he might be the most underappreciated of their core 4 IMO.
Lastly, as much as some want to sh!t on Gillespie, he had better scoring numbers, definitely better shooting #'s (not even close), better asst. to TO #'s and comparable rebs. as Q. So there's that... But I know he's not flashy, just effective. Personally I'll take fundamental efficiency over flash as Gillespie and Nova care less about posters and more about banners.
Westbrook#36 wrote:scoscox wrote:kayako wrote:Projecting 2nd team BE for Samuels is clearly projecting potential that's within reach. But most Nova fans know the breakout season is coming if Samuels can lose the jitters. How valuable is a versatile defender who can rebound well for his size? He'll play in the league if he can shoot the 3 adequately. His raw stats from last season is irrelevant, as this doesn't look like a linear progression. Not sure if he'll get the 2nd team nod as Nova's stacked with forwards that can score.
I think that's reasonable, but I also think that there are other guys who are more proven that could've easily been given that spot. E.g. both honorable mentions, yurtseven and scruggs among others. Same goes for gillespie, although the case for his potential isn't as strong as samuels. TBH i probably have more of a problem with gillespie than samuels, because, as i said, his potential is so much greater.
Yeah I hear you about Gillespie. Coaches love him because he's solid, heady and doesn't make many mistakes. He's always where he's suppose to be, but he's not the guy you should worry about beating you. Best case scenario for Nova is the CG is the 5th option on offense, if he's 2 or 3 then we're in deep trouble.
kayako wrote:If Samuels is unproven, Gillespie is a proven mediocrity as a pg.
GumbyDamnit! wrote:I know still one game to go but would think the All-BE 6th player on the first team is up in the air. I believe the following are locks: Powell, Howard, Baldwin, Alexander and Bey. Diallo, Zegarowski, maybe Jones will battle for that last spot.
Add 2 of those 3 to the 2nd team, along with Marshall, Reed and then a battle between Gillespie, McClung/Yurtseven, Figgy for last spot IMO.
Hon mention candidates (in addition to above): Mitch B, C Moore, McDermott, McKnight or Mamu?, Pipkens or Duke?,
POY? Prob Powell.
FOY? Prob JRE
COY? Big Mac.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests