fellahmuskie wrote:I think last night was good overall for the league. It feels like we have four legit tournament teams in Nova, Marquette, SJU and Seton Hall. I think one more team will sneak in, but when X is not playing those four, I'll be rooting for them to get as high a seed as possible.
GoldenWarrior11 wrote:Omaha1 wrote:I can’t get the photo to load. Pretty obviously still in his hand with 0.0 and red light on backboard. Ref seemed pretty excited to call it good. Still never should have come down to this moment.
cu blujs wrote:On top of that, you had the five clear steps taken by Hauser on MU's inbounds pass with 25 seconds left and CU down 2. Would have still had to score, which was far from a given for this team. But, how a referee stands five feet away from him looking directly at him and doesn't see the five steps is absolutely beyond me. It wasn't even close. CU could have held for a shot to tie or win at the buzzer. Of course, would have had to inbound the ball successfully first .
cu blujs wrote:On top of that, you had the five clear steps taken by Hauser on MU's inbounds pass with 25 seconds left and CU down 2. Would have still had to score, which was far from a given for this team. But, how a referee stands five feet away from him looking directly at him and doesn't see the five steps is absolutely beyond me. It wasn't even close. CU could have held for a shot to tie or win at the buzzer. Of course, would have had to inbound the ball successfully first .
We have been asking the same question. The deep pass was the only way to lose that game. A short pass (even directly to a Marquette player in the paint) would not have left enough time for a three. Just a bad mistake that cost us a game!Hall2012 wrote:What I don't get is why on earth did Creighton throw the inbound pass deep? They literally could have handed the ball to a Marquette player under the basket and would have won the game.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests