stever20 wrote:The UConn/Creighton game from a league perspective is so remarkable...
UConn winning would get them much closer to being a 4 seed
Creighton winning would clinch them a spot in the tourney you'd think- and may keep them out of Dayton even.
Could really see a good argument for either side of that coin as to which way is better to go for the league.
And other games are interesting as well for different teams....
LSU/Arkansas a good example.
LSU wins and could easily pass UConn. Loses and could easily fall behind Marquette
Arkansas wins and could easily pass Providence. Loses and gets much easier for UConn to pass them.
so really not an easy one where result definitely helps the league out.
kayako wrote:stever20 wrote:The UConn/Creighton game from a league perspective is so remarkable...
UConn winning would get them much closer to being a 4 seed
Creighton winning would clinch them a spot in the tourney you'd think- and may keep them out of Dayton even.
Could really see a good argument for either side of that coin as to which way is better to go for the league.
And other games are interesting as well for different teams....
LSU/Arkansas a good example.
LSU wins and could easily pass UConn. Loses and could easily fall behind Marquette
Arkansas wins and could easily pass Providence. Loses and gets much easier for UConn to pass them.
so really not an easy one where result definitely helps the league out.
Rutgers/Indiana is fascinating as well. It seems like bracketologists are all over the place with those 2 teams. Could be the most important bubble game tonight.
stever20 wrote:The UConn/Creighton game from a league perspective is so remarkable...
UConn winning would get them much closer to being a 4 seed
Creighton winning would clinch them a spot in the tourney you'd think- and may keep them out of Dayton even.
Could really see a good argument for either side of that coin as to which way is better to go for the league.
MackNova wrote:There is a big difference between a 4 seed and a 5 seed. The 12 seeds this year look like they could be very frisky. The top low-major teams are better than usual, and the major conference teams on the bubble have a higher ceiling than normal. Facing a 13 instead of a 12 is big.
I think it's more important for the league to have teams make deep runs in March as opposed to just getting teams in, so if the goal is to root for the best outcome for the conference, I think it's UConn.
If Nembhard were healthy, I would argue to root for Creighton because I think Creighton would be good enough to win a game or two in March. Without him, I think Creighton is a dead team walking if they make the tournament.
MackNova wrote:There is a big difference between a 4 seed and a 5 seed. The 12 seeds this year look like they could be very frisky. The top low-major teams are better than usual, and the major conference teams on the bubble have a higher ceiling than normal. Facing a 13 instead of a 12 is big.
I think it's more important for the league to have teams make deep runs in March as opposed to just getting teams in, so if the goal is to root for the best outcome for the conference, I think it's UConn.
If Nembhard were healthy, I would argue to root for Creighton because I think Creighton would be good enough to win a game or two in March. Without him, I think Creighton is a dead team walking if they make the tournament.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 18 guests