hortle wrote:also, if basically everyone (on this board, on the internet, in the basketball media sphere at-large) is picking providence to finish in the same range, and you're the only one here crying about it, who looks to be more in the wrong? Do you want Westbrook or these other repeated offenders of dissing on PC to prostrate themselves before you? Not really sure why you have to be so venomous about this
FriarJ wrote:I would think bottom quarter would be where most expect us to finish, which has been the case in 3 out of the 4 years on this board. It just strikes us as funny as almost no one on this board knows anything about the current Friar squad except they lost Dunn and Bentil, that's all anybody talks about just like every other year, I'm sure that's why we are sensitive because it's the same tune every year from the same posters, who never admit they were wrong and come right back the next year with the exact same predictions. For some reason on this board and it doesn't seem to apply to other schools PC is always judged by what they lost and never by what they have.
Examples: You lost Marshawn Brooks and Vincent Council; expect a down year, You lost Bryce Cotton and Kadeem Batts; they will be worse, You lost Henton, Harris, Derosiers, Chuckwu; expect a down year. You lost Dunn and Bentil; this year should be the year this board is right. My expectations are for zero wins in conference
Hall2012 wrote:Yup, only Providence has ever been underrated on this board because we all hate them. They're the only school that gets judged on who they lose and not who they gain.
FriarJ wrote:I can't argue with that. In regards to Nova I always have had a soft spot. My daughter is a SHU graduate, was a GA in the athletic department there and now is finishing up an MFA at Nova. I have no venom for any of the schools except maybe the Bluejays!
I'm joking Hortie!
Hall2012 wrote:Hall2012 wrote:Yup, only Providence has ever been underrated on this board because we all hate them. They're the only school that gets judged on who they lose and not who they gain.
PC Board picks (from Holy Land Fan Poll) vs actual finish so far:
2013-14: Picked 6th, finished in 3 way tie for 3rd (1 game above 6th)
2014-15: Picked 4th, finished 4th
2015-16: Picked 6th, finished tied for 4th (1 game above 6th)
So PC has never (until this year which is still unfinished) been picked by this board to finish in the bottom 3rd of the league. They slightly outperformed where they were picked in 2 of the 3 years, but they've never been horribly disrespected in their preseason ranking.
Westbrook#36 wrote:Hall2012 wrote:Hall2012 wrote:Yup, only Providence has ever been underrated on this board because we all hate them. They're the only school that gets judged on who they lose and not who they gain.
PC Board picks (from Holy Land Fan Poll) vs actual finish so far:
2013-14: Picked 6th, finished in 3 way tie for 3rd (1 game above 6th)
2014-15: Picked 4th, finished 4th
2015-16: Picked 6th, finished tied for 4th (1 game above 6th)
So PC has never (until this year which is still unfinished) been picked by this board to finish in the bottom 3rd of the league. They slightly outperformed where they were picked in 2 of the 3 years, but they've never been horribly disrespected in their preseason ranking.
Hey now, what do you think you're doing? Bringing factual information into a internet message board dispute, quit that right now!
FriarJ wrote:I would think bottom quarter would be where most expect us to finish, which has been the case in 3 out of the 4 years on this board. It just strikes us as funny as almost no one on this board knows anything about the current Friar squad except they lost Dunn and Bentil, that's all anybody talks about just like every other year, I'm sure that's why we are sensitive because it's the same tune every year from the same posters, who never admit they were wrong and come right back the next year with the exact same predictions. For some reason on this board and it doesn't seem to apply to other schools PC is always judged by what they lost and never by what they have.
Examples: You lost Marshawn Brooks and Vincent Council; expect a down year, You lost Bryce Cotton and Kadeem Batts; they will be worse, You lost Henton, Harris, Derosiers, Chuckwu; expect a down year. You lost Dunn and Bentil; this year should be the year this board is right. My expectations are for zero wins in conference
TAMU Eagle wrote:FriarJ wrote:I would think bottom quarter would be where most expect us to finish, which has been the case in 3 out of the 4 years on this board. It just strikes us as funny as almost no one on this board knows anything about the current Friar squad except they lost Dunn and Bentil, that's all anybody talks about just like every other year, I'm sure that's why we are sensitive because it's the same tune every year from the same posters, who never admit they were wrong and come right back the next year with the exact same predictions. For some reason on this board and it doesn't seem to apply to other schools PC is always judged by what they lost and never by what they have.
Examples: You lost Marshawn Brooks and Vincent Council; expect a down year, You lost Bryce Cotton and Kadeem Batts; they will be worse, You lost Henton, Harris, Derosiers, Chuckwu; expect a down year. You lost Dunn and Bentil; this year should be the year this board is right. My expectations are for zero wins in conference
All I've seen on this board is that Marquette loses Ellenson so they will be worse. Same with Hall and Whitehead. Same with Butler and Durham/Jones. I don't think PC is alone in this. However, PC loses more production than any other team besides St Johns (which was bad production so it's OK).
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 15 guests