Bluejay wrote:ecasadoSBU wrote: You dont wanna have such a huge divide between the Top half and bottom half.
I respectfully disagree. Huge separations create tourney bids.
Nevertheless, nice job by SJU to hang with 'em and fight back.
DudeAnon wrote:Crazy how SJHooper happens to be away from his computer whenever the Redmen win.
Bluejay wrote:ecasadoSBU wrote: You dont wanna have such a huge divide between the Top half and bottom half.
I respectfully disagree. Huge separations create tourney bids.
Nevertheless, nice job by SJU to hang with 'em and fight back.
XUFan09 wrote:Unfortunately, this will probably be considered a bad loss for Butler, because RPI (and not Kenpom, Sagarin, etc.) is considered the basis for judging an opponent. Advanced metrics put SJU at the back end of the top 100, so a road loss wouldn't be a "good" loss but wouldn't be a bad one either. However, RPI Forecast puts SJU somewhere in the 150-170 range (A 10-8 conference record would probably be needed to get them in the top 100, but with good luck, 9-9 might do it). Luckily, the Selection Committee has a notable subjective component, so the members that cover Big East will make clear that the numbers aren't entirely fair for how well SJU sometimes plays. It just sucks that RPI alone don't tell the true story for Butler's loss when it's the central metric.
This won't sink Butler's tournament bid, but a protected seed just got harder. In the long run, though, SJU needs to experience winning and needs to build a winning culture. That's not just a switch that can be flicked on once a program is truly competitive, so there will be some victims along the way who get hit with the bad loss while the team is developing its potential.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 15 guests