Sunday's Games 2/28

[JohnW22]

Congrats on Seton Hall for punching their ticket if it wasn't punched already. Question for Seton Hall fans I know last year there were a lot of locker room problems down the stretch and it sounded like it revolved around Gibbs and Whitehead, I've heard nothing bad attitude wise with Whitehead this year, was it mainly Gibbs with the attitude problem?

[Westbrook#36]

a home loss to Seton Hall would get their RPI down to 60-65, and would hurt their KP rating as well(right now 38).. To me, they either need a win over Seton Hall, OR wins over Marquette and QF in BET(would also be vs Seton Hall almost surely in the 3/6 game). The Marquette win at home wouldn't be a big help at all. I know before yesterday Lunardi said he thought they needed 3 wins including the BET.

Of course you feel that way, it's typical stever BE glass is half empty point of view. Lunardi will say that until Sunday March 13th 5:00 est, then magically change it once his committee informant tells him Butler is in(probably with room to spare). With the state of the bubble 20 wins by Butler most likely gets them in, that said a win in the BET wouldn't hurt.

[stever20]

a home loss to Seton Hall would get their RPI down to 60-65, and would hurt their KP rating as well(right now 38).. To me, they either need a win over Seton Hall, OR wins over Marquette and QF in BET(would also be vs Seton Hall almost surely in the 3/6 game). The Marquette win at home wouldn't be a big help at all. I know before yesterday Lunardi said he thought they needed 3 wins including the BET.

Of course you feel that way, it's typical stever BE glass is half empty point of view. Lunardi will say that until Sunday March 13th 5:00 est, then magically change it once his committee informant tells him Butler is in(probably with room to spare). With the state of the bubble 20 wins by Butler most likely gets them in, that said a win in the BET wouldn't hurt.

They might have 20 wins in that case, but would have only 5 top 100 wins. With quite possibly only 2 wins vs teams in the tourney- Purdue and Seton Hall- maybe a third with Cincy.

Also, his bracket didn't change much at all from Sunday morning last year to the one at the tail end. I know you love bashing Lunardi- but it's a joke.

[Westbrook#36]

They might have 20 wins in that case, but would have only 5 top 100 wins. With quite possibly only 2 wins vs teams in the tourney- Purdue and Seton Hall- maybe a third with Cincy.

Also, his bracket didn't change much at all from Sunday morning last year to the one at the tail end. I know you love bashing Lunardi- but it's a joke.

No you're the joke, exactly how many wins over probable tourney teams does UConn have again?

[JohnW22]

They might have 20 wins in that case, but would have only 5 top 100 wins. With quite possibly only 2 wins vs teams in the tourney- Purdue and Seton Hall- maybe a third with Cincy.

Also, his bracket didn't change much at all from Sunday morning last year to the one at the tail end. I know you love bashing Lunardi- but it's a joke.

No your the joke, exactly how many wins over probable tourney teams does UConn have again?

I can answer this one. 1 win over a tournement team, just as many as St. John's

[Jet915]

Any chance Seton is ranked tomorrow? They should be....

[stever20]

They might have 20 wins in that case, but would have only 5 top 100 wins. With quite possibly only 2 wins vs teams in the tourney- Purdue and Seton Hall- maybe a third with Cincy.

Also, his bracket didn't change much at all from Sunday morning last year to the one at the tail end. I know you love bashing Lunardi- but it's a joke.

No your the joke, exactly how many wins over probable tourney teams does UConn have again?

Texas for sure. Michigan for sure. So there's 2. Then they will look at SMU as a tourney level team. So that's 3 right now.

[Westbrook#36]

No your the joke, exactly how many wins over probable tourney teams does UConn have again?

Texas for sure. Michigan for sure. So there's 2. Then they will look at SMU as a tourney level team. So that's 3 right now.

That's nice Butler and Providence both have 4 wins over tourney level teams. BTW that SMU win isn't looking as sparkling as it once was.

[stever20]

No your the joke, exactly how many wins over probable tourney teams does UConn have again?

Texas for sure. Michigan for sure. So there's 2. Then they will look at SMU as a tourney level team. So that's 3 right now.

That's nice Butler and Providence both have 4 wins over tourney level teams. BTW that SMU win isn't looking as sparkling as it once was.

Butler has Cincy maybe, Purdue, OOC but then in conference really only Seton Hall. I'm guessing you're counting Temple as the 4th???
PC has Arizona OOC, but then in conference play Nova. Butler isn't a tourney level team yet so you can't count them as such.....

[Westbrook#36]

Texas for sure. Michigan for sure. So there's 2. Then they will look at SMU as a tourney level team. So that's 3 right now.

That's nice Butler and Providence both have 4 wins over tourney level teams. BTW that SMU win isn't looking as sparkling as it once was.

Butler has Cincy maybe, Purdue, OOC but then in conference really only Seton Hall. I'm guessing you're counting Temple as the 4th???
PC has Arizona OOC, but then in conference play Nova. Butler isn't a tourney level team yet so you can't count them as such.....

So Michigan is a tourney level team but Butler and Temple aren't? The same Temple team you've been talking up the last couple of weeks as a tourney team? That says it all, again I'm done with this. This is the reason you have no respect or credibility on this board.