Which year of Big East better?

[stever20]

I'm interested in revisiting this mainly out of frustration at Seton Hall winning 4 straight Big East games, with a possibility of stretching it to 7, without picking up a single meaningful, resume building (top 50) win. Maybe it's just flukey scheduling, but I can't help but feel like that wouldn't have been possible last year because the conference was so much stronger. Too many genres this year seem like they're about avoiding bad losses.

Seriously, seton hall may be better off losing their return game at Georgetown to pull the hoyas rpi closer to the top 50 and make the win they have meaningful.

Yeah, things didn't go so well in the tourney, but I think the league was better last year.

Right now we have 6 teams in the rpi top 100, last year we had six teams in the top 50. That means last year every other game was a potential resume builder. This

I think got to see what the tourney seeds are. If Nova and X are both 1's, and PC rights their ship and gets like a 4 or 5- Give me that scenario any time at all over a year where you have a 1 but then 4 and a bunch of 6-9's.

[NovaBall]

Last year's regular season was better

[FenwayFriar]

Last year's regular season was better

We won't be able to answer this until the second week of March Madness. Regular season doesn't mean anything to the national public, and that's what we need to focus on as a league. We know how good this conference is because we see them every night. Most of the nation (looking at FS1 ratings) hasn't seen our teams much. We need to produce in March, end of story.

[NovaBall]

If you want to know which March is better, sure, we have to wait.

In terms of regular season, which is still a legit discussion, last year was probably better.