DemonLS wrote:Thank you, RedStorm. Could not have stated it any better.
Until St. John's and DePaul reach new heights, the Big East will not be recognized, as a conference, on the same level as the P5. Nova can be great every year but that will not help OUR cause.
The TV networks WANT New York and Chicago big-time.....for a future TV contract!
NovaBall wrote:South Carolina, Florida state and penn state are not good teams. Those are bad losses. Maybe dropping one or two would be okay, but they dropped all 3 and two were blowouts, and looked bad against western Michigan.
It is fair to be concerned about the lack of either judgment or effort in Chicago right now. They are hurting the league and it does not appear they are serious about improving. Their only positive is the new arena, which is years away from being utilized.
NovaBall wrote:DemonLS wrote:Thank you, RedStorm. Could not have stated it any better.
Until St. John's and DePaul reach new heights, the Big East will not be recognized, as a conference, on the same level as the P5. Nova can be great every year but that will not help OUR cause.
The TV networks WANT New York and Chicago big-time.....for a future TV contract!
Nova and Georgetown are in philly and DC. Let's not go acting like they are in some backwards town. And the east coast stronghold is what makes the big east what it is.
Chicago is a nice bonus market. But the lifeblood of the big east has always been DC through philly up to the garden.
Now that's not saying I don't want a Chicago presence. I definitely would like a quality team in Chicago that attracts attention, makes the news, draws fans, etc... But that obviously is not going to happen for a long time. And the big east will still be fine.
DemonLS wrote:The Big East will be fine.....but not reach its highest potential.....if fine is good enough for you.....its not good enough for me.
.
NovaBall wrote:We are getting off track here, but 1. I'm not underestimatin how good it will be to have a Chicago presence. I would love DePaul to be a college hoops anchor in the Midwest; but at the same time (2) it is just as important that we maintain our presence as the premier team in the northeast corridor.
It's not even real a debate or argument. We need all of our teams to do well. But this idea that we can have nova tank and the league would be fine is false. Georgetown, nova and St. John are very important to the success of the league. And for fifteen yrs the league has been fine with DePaul being DePaul (although the league would be better if DePaul would follow Georgetown or nova's lead and hire a real coach)
MUBoxer wrote:NovaBall wrote:We are getting off track here, but 1. I'm not underestimatin how good it will be to have a Chicago presence. I would love DePaul to be a college hoops anchor in the Midwest; but at the same time (2) it is just as important that we maintain our presence as the premier team in the northeast corridor.
It's not even real a debate or argument. We need all of our teams to do well. But this idea that we can have nova tank and the league would be fine is false. Georgetown, nova and St. John are very important to the success of the league. And for fifteen yrs the league has been fine with DePaul being DePaul (although the league would be better if DePaul would follow Georgetown or nova's lead and hire a real coach)
See that's where I think you're too ingrained in this old Big East idea. If Marquette and DePaul looked like they did in the 70s/early 80s and GTown and Nova fell flat the big east would be just as fine as they are now. And yes for 10 years the leagues been fine without DePaul (where'd you get 15? They joined in 05 and its 2015) but the same could be said about St. John's which you so avidly vouche for despite their struggles.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests