GoldenWarrior11 wrote:As if it needed to be emphasized yet again - after the consistent thumping of the AAC's chests and disappointing basketball losses - but UConn staying in the AAC for men's basketball is not sustainable. Fact of the matter is that UConn/Cincy are both with 8 other schools that were elevated from Conference USA and another from the Atlantic-10. With each passing year, the likelihood of them losing to a team like USF/UCF/Tulane/East Carolina/Tulsa just increases - and, last night, came to fruition.
UConn, despite being a top basketball program in the country, is not strong enough to elevate all of the weak programs in the conference. The other 9 schools, especially the weaker programs, will continue to bring them down. Between UCF (4), Tulane (3), East Carolina (2) and USF (3) - over a third of the conference in basketball - has a combined twelve NCAA Tournament appearances in their respective program's history. If you throw in SMU and Houston, since 1995, those two programs have a combined two appearances in the NCAA tournament. Add those six schools up (UCF, Tulane, ECU, USF, Houston, SMU), and you have over half of a conference that has been extremely poor in basketball for over 20 years. Compare that to the Big East, which has had all of it's programs make the tournament since 2004, and six of the schools have advanced to the Sweet 16 in that time. There's just no comparison between the leagues.
So glad that the C7 avoided that dumpster fire.
NovaBall wrote:Just the fact that we are debating whether Conference of All Americans is a one or two bid league says a lot about the quality of that league.
stever20 wrote:NovaBall wrote:Just the fact that we are debating whether Conference of All Americans is a one or two bid league says a lot about the quality of that league.
First off, just stop your idiotic Conference of All Americans. It's sophomoric and idiotic. It's the AAC. Just like it's DePaul and not the Chicago Franchise. Are you 12?
If the AAC does get 2 teams in this year- it is an improvement from last year. Why? Because SMU would have been in as well with both of those teams. That's the thing folks want to forget/ignore. And heaven help if they get 3 in, that would mean they would have gotten 4 in.
Jet915 wrote:Can u imagine if the Big East was a 1 or 2 bid league? Some people would be calling for the end of the conference...
Westbrook#36 wrote:Temple double tappin' Cincy's tourney hopes. Win @ home in double OT 67-65.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests