Bill Marsh wrote:I came across the following list from June, 2015, rank ordering colleges by the amount of money they spend on their basketball programs. This would include the 2 most important things to a coach about a school - how much they pay him and what level of financial support will they provide for the program. I realize that there are other factors that go into making a top program, so I just offer this as one piece of the puzzle.
1. Louisville
2. Kentucky
3. Duke
4. Syracuse
5. Oklahoma State
6. Minnesota
7. Indiana
8. Marquette
9. Georgetown
10. Auburn
11. Michigan State
12. Arizona
13. Texas
14. Florida
15. Memphis
16. Pitt
17. Kansas
18. Oregon State
19. UCLA
20. UConn
21. St. John's
22. Baylor
23. Illinois
24. Oklahoma
25. NC State
26. West Virginia
27. Arkansas
28. Virginia
29. Wisconsin
30. Michigan
31. Wake Forest
32. Villanova
33. North Carolina
34. Arizona State
35. Boston College
36. Providence
37. Vanderbilt
38. SMU
39. South Carolina
40. Texas A&M
ConnersvilleBulldog wrote:To answer the original question - No, St. John's is absolutely not a "top job" anymore.
Honest question: Let's say the St. John's job opened up in a couple of years and they wanted to go after some up-and-coming mid-major coach. Does anyone feel like it would be a slamdunk that that coach would choose St. John's over a school like Clemson or Oklahoma State? I honestly don't. And those schools certainly aren't elite basketball schools.
ConnersvilleBulldog wrote:To answer the original question - No, St. John's is absolutely not a "top job" anymore.
Honest question: Let's say the St. John's job opened up in a couple of years and they wanted to go after some up-and-coming mid-major coach. Does anyone feel like it would be a slamdunk that that coach would choose St. John's over a school like Clemson or Oklahoma State? I honestly don't. And those schools certainly aren't elite basketball schools.
Bill Marsh wrote:ConnersvilleBulldog wrote:To answer the original question - No, St. John's is absolutely not a "top job" anymore.
Honest question: Let's say the St. John's job opened up in a couple of years and they wanted to go after some up-and-coming mid-major coach. Does anyone feel like it would be a slamdunk that that coach would choose St. John's over a school like Clemson or Oklahoma State? I honestly don't. And those schools certainly aren't elite basketball schools.
They would if the choice was St John's vs Clemson. OK State is a different story. OK State isn't guaranteed either as evidenced by the fact that their coach with multiple years left on a lucrative contract walked out to go to St Louis, reportedly due to meddling big donors. Are the Billikens a better job than the Redmen?
Bill Marsh wrote:ConnersvilleBulldog wrote:To answer the original question - No, St. John's is absolutely not a "top job" anymore.
Honest question: Let's say the St. John's job opened up in a couple of years and they wanted to go after some up-and-coming mid-major coach. Does anyone feel like it would be a slamdunk that that coach would choose St. John's over a school like Clemson or Oklahoma State? I honestly don't. And those schools certainly aren't elite basketball schools.
They would if the choice was St John's vs Clemson. OK State is a different story. OK State isn't guaranteed either as evidenced by the fact that their coach with multiple years left on a lucrative contract walked out to go to St Louis, reportedly due to meddling big donors. Are the Billikens a better job than the Redmen?
stever20 wrote:But that 3 year period just was a blip quite frankly. Lets say Providence or Seton Hall goes back into a funk now for the next 15 years(I'm definitely not calling it, but just using as an example). It's going to feel like they have been dormant much longer than just the 15 years because of the time before those 3 years.
Also the problems in those 1st 10 years were already starting to show. In Carnasecca's last 10 years- they made the tourney in 9 of 10 years(with the other year being an NIT title). 105-57 in those 10 years in Big East play. So to go from that to 5 of 10, with in those 10 years 93-81 in Big East play(in a time where the Big East was probably close to it's weakest ever as well). 4 losing overall years(first time with a losing year since the 60's).
Bill Marsh wrote:ConnersvilleBulldog wrote:To answer the original question - No, St. John's is absolutely not a "top job" anymore.
Honest question: Let's say the St. John's job opened up in a couple of years and they wanted to go after some up-and-coming mid-major coach. Does anyone feel like it would be a slamdunk that that coach would choose St. John's over a school like Clemson or Oklahoma State? I honestly don't. And those schools certainly aren't elite basketball schools.
They would if the choice was St John's vs Clemson. OK State is a different story. OK State isn't guaranteed either as evidenced by the fact that their coach with multiple years left on a lucrative contract walked out to go to St Louis, reportedly due to meddling big donors. Are the Billikens a better job than the Redmen?
SJHooper wrote:This is literally the biggest stage. Being in a premier conference in the biggest city on the biggest stage in the most famous arena with the cameras flashing all over and being able to be paid $2 million a year while living comfortably on Long Island or in a luxurious apartment in Manhattan...pretty sure many coaches would say yes.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests