Westbrook#36 wrote:Temple serial killing acc tourney bid hopes. Take down UConn in Storrs to improve to 7-6 on the year.
Westbrook#36 wrote:Temple serial killing AACtourney bid hopes. Take down UConn in Storrs to improve to 7-6 on the year.
kmacker69 wrote:Wow Cinci is almost like DePaul in that they play everyone tough and then blow it at the end. Keep on beating them up Temple! LOL!
stever20 wrote:what's going to be interesting if they go into the AAC tourney as projected right now...
Cincy 43
UConn 53
If Cincy/UConn make the conference final- both should get in at that point. The 2 Conference tourney wins- including one over a top 100 team in the SF most likely- would be huge.
Also the fact that both are in the top 35 in Ken Pom is huge. Advanced metrics meaning a lot now more than ever before. See last year.
adoraz wrote:stever20 wrote:what's going to be interesting if they go into the AAC tourney as projected right now...
Cincy 43
UConn 53
If Cincy/UConn make the conference final- both should get in at that point. The 2 Conference tourney wins- including one over a top 100 team in the SF most likely- would be huge.
Also the fact that both are in the top 35 in Ken Pom is huge. Advanced metrics meaning a lot now more than ever before. See last year.
You can say the AAC had a good year in football for a G5 conference (they did). You can say their basketball recruiting for a few schools in doing well, and that the lower tier schools aren't recruiting as poorly as they were previously. But it is an undeniable truth that the AAC is doing absolutely abysmal in basketball this year. SMU doesn't count because they cheated to get where they're at, aren't eligible, and will tank in future years.
The highest RPI is Temple at 76. Tulsa is second at 84. Cincinnati and Connecticut are at 94 and 98! Those teams would be considered bad losses as of today.
I have no idea why you're expecting the UC schools to magically jump 50 spots in the RPI as that would require dominating the conference which they haven't done.
As for Kenpom, 2 things: 1. don't they factor in the last two years or so? (I could be wrong about this but I think they also count last year's results which will have no meaning when the teams are selected in March). 2. advanced metrics are mostly used for SEEDING. It's very difficult to make the tournament if you're not top 50 in RPI.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests