Updated 1/29 bracketology

The home for Big East hoops

Re: Updated 1/29 bracketology

Postby GumbyDamnit! » Fri Jan 29, 2016 3:44 pm

adoraz wrote:Stever, estimated seed positioning could have some relevance to some people, however, estimating match ups right now is laughable. Hell, estimating matchups even on the day before selection Sunday rarely work out.

Just a waste of time and not thread worthy.


...And then breaking down the hypothetical matchups to point out how SHU would struggle vs. Texas is downright idiotic. Then posting a series of hypothetical matchups of dozens of teams is....(running out of negative adjectives).... anyone?
Go Nova!
User avatar
GumbyDamnit!
 
Posts: 3149
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:39 pm

Re: Updated 1/29 bracketology

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Updated 1/29 bracketology

Postby ecasadoSBU » Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:04 pm

stever20 wrote:
well lets do it like this...
PC 4 seed...
13 seeds are UC Irvine, Stony Brook, South Dakota St, San Diego St
5 seeds are Kentucky, Louisville, Purdue, Dayton
12 seeds are VCU, Chattanooga, UALR, PIG winner

...



Stever, I have no doubt that my alma mater can easily beat Providence... That would be a terrible matchup for PC :lol: :lol:

Seriously though? Who the heck cares about this potential matchups at this point?

Thanks can change so much from here till March. More than a month removed from the NCAA
Stony Brook Red, Connecticut Blue, and Big East basketball!
ecasadoSBU
 
Posts: 1524
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:02 am

Re: Updated 1/29 bracketology

Postby BEX » Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:21 pm

X would love to get the Dukies. revenge for '04.
User avatar
BEX
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 4:00 pm

Re: Updated 1/29 bracketology

Postby adoraz » Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:29 pm

Stever I know you like numbers so here's one to investigate: the odds these matchups actually take place.

Once you realize it's close to zero you'll see why I think talking about this is pointless.
Johnnies
adoraz
 
Posts: 1955
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2014 5:13 pm

Re: Updated 1/29 bracketology

Postby xusandy » Fri Jan 29, 2016 5:46 pm

Yeah, yeah, it's never gonna happen this way, but what I find interesting is the lack of clear difference between the top line seeds and the rest of the pack. The teams Palm has at the 8/9 seeds are St Mary's, Cal, Texas Tech, Butler, Notre Dame, Duke, Washington, and Indiana. Any of those teams could beat a 1 or 2 seed and it wouldn't be considered a HUGE upset. Heck, 3 of the 8/9 seeds were in the AP top 25 this week. In a season with so many good teams, and no truly great ones, early round wins in the dance are definitely not going to be a piece of cake. I actually wouldn't be surprised if the Final 4 includes ZERO 1 seeds.
xusandy
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:21 am

Re: Updated 1/29 bracketology

Postby PorthosPA » Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:49 pm

I just want a few things out of the rest of this season:

1. Xavier to win out.
2. Nova to win out (except the X game).
3. For X and Nova to meet in the conference championship game and whoever wins the game to do it on a buzzer beater.
4. Both teams to get 1 seeds.
5. Both teams to get to the Final 4 and legitimize the conference to outside eyes.

If Butler could go on one of their tourney runs and join them, that would be great too (or any other conference member).

Is that too much to ask?
PorthosPA
 
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 12:25 am

Re: Updated 1/29 bracketology

Postby XtoDC » Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:33 pm

stever20 wrote:Right now- PC being a 4 seed is about best case scenario for them. That's not a fictional scenario at all.

Just looking at bracket matrix with all brackets done yesterday(16 of them)....
Nova 1.1875
Xavier 1.5
PC 5.5
Butler 10.42
Seton Hall 11.36

I'm not saying that's what definitely will happen- but what Palm has is pretty close to a best case scenario seed wise(though Butler would GLADLY IMO take being a 10 over a 8 or 9 quite frankly).

You can act like PC being a 4 or 5 is fiction, but given ALL of their metrics, that's very realistic right now.


Butler has done well from that position before, and in a year where there isn't an extremely strong upper class the 8/9 line shouldn't be as feared as it normally would be. Normally I would prefer the top of the league to be really strong because of what we're used to, but this year is so much different with the talent spread out. More teams in the tourney this year is probably a better result just because of how the year is going.

In a normal year I would absolutely agree that stronger teams are more important, but this year no one is scared of anyone. It is going to be absolute madness once the tournament starts. It should be very exciting for the average fan.
XtoDC
 
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 7:35 am

Re: Updated 1/29 bracketology

Postby stever20 » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:01 pm

Saw Lunardi did no bracket but a seed list(which I find better anyways)...
Nova 4
Xavier 5
Prov 14
Butler 38(one of last 4 byes)
S Hall 48(last team in)
was done about 530 last night- so before last nights action....
doesn't seem to have the first 4 out so don't know where the Hoyas stand with him.... was in the next 4 out on Monday....
stever20
 
Posts: 13491
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:43 pm

Previous

Return to Big East basketball message board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests