TheHall wrote:yorost wrote:TheHall wrote:Thx for the link...great interview. But I'm not buying that list unless expansion happens next year, otherwise why wait...because you're still looking.
The list wasn't four teams for four additions. They could be waiting for many reasons, one of which could simply be wanting more time to evaluate.
I think the push to 12 was set long ago, the money makes sense. But more time to evaluate isn't how realignment has been working. Conferences & schools have only waited because they weren't sure about the numbers being big enough. He said five years...five years is forever in the realignment era. Butler wouldn't have been on the BE first expansion list 5 years ago and maybe not for 11 or 12 either. I think the longer they wait, more teams are going to get on that list that's all.
yorost wrote:TheHall wrote:yorost wrote:The list wasn't four teams for four additions. They could be waiting for many reasons, one of which could simply be wanting more time to evaluate.
I think the push to 12 was set long ago, the money makes sense. But more time to evaluate isn't how realignment has been working. Conferences & schools have only waited because they weren't sure about the numbers being big enough. He said five years...five years is forever in the realignment era. Butler wouldn't have been on the BE first expansion list 5 years ago and maybe not for 11 or 12 either. I think the longer they wait, more teams are going to get on that list that's all.
I don't know why they stopped at 10, but any team that pops up in the next few years is going to have the same question marks or worse than the four listed. At this point, the biggest question, in my opinion, is who is setup best long term. That's not so easy to answer without programs already established for some time. Another year or two of SLU and VCU making the NCAA's could seal the deal for them. A newcomer has to succeed, already have some reasonable history, have suitable facilities, and show it isn't a fluke. Not many programs out there where that is realistically possible, we're not picking Duke's off the board or anything. I won't rule out a dark horse, Detroit or Duquense coming on strong, and in a hurry, might have an argument, but I suspect this is more about waiting to see if certain programs falter or not.
TheHall wrote:yorost wrote:TheHall wrote:I think the push to 12 was set long ago, the money makes sense. But more time to evaluate isn't how realignment has been working. Conferences & schools have only waited because they weren't sure about the numbers being big enough. He said five years...five years is forever in the realignment era. Butler wouldn't have been on the BE first expansion list 5 years ago and maybe not for 11 or 12 either. I think the longer they wait, more teams are going to get on that list that's all.
I don't know why they stopped at 10, but any team that pops up in the next few years is going to have the same question marks or worse than the four listed. At this point, the biggest question, in my opinion, is who is setup best long term. That's not so easy to answer without programs already established for some time. Another year or two of SLU and VCU making the NCAA's could seal the deal for them. A newcomer has to succeed, already have some reasonable history, have suitable facilities, and show it isn't a fluke. Not many programs out there where that is realistically possible, we're not picking Duke's off the board or anything. I won't rule out a dark horse, Detroit or Duquense coming on strong, and in a hurry, might have an argument, but I suspect this is more about waiting to see if certain programs falter or not.
I should have mentioned that I'm thinking along the lines of dmac80, what if Fox Sports investment in the BE exceeds expectations over te next few years, does the American or the MVC become poachable.
Bluejay wrote:TheHall wrote:I should have mentioned that I'm thinking along the lines of dmac80, what if Fox Sports investment in the BE exceeds expectations over te next few years, does the American or the MVC become poachable.
Well, the MVC is already poachable. That is where Creighton came from.... and I'm pretty sure Wichita St would jump in a second if we wanted them (and we do not want them!)
Don't forget, the issue isn't so much poachability; its football. For nonfootball playing schools, I think we could select about any one of them we wanted and they'd jump right now.
TheHall wrote:Hahaha...my bad I meant the Mountain West (SDSU)...But I do think there are fb schools out there that didn't get what they wanted out of realignment that are thinking of new models that may create opportunities for the BE to consider. Who's to say the hybrid model is dead or can't work. It's a different landscape now. And what about Gonzaga.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 26 guests