TheBasketballOpinion wrote:https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/27216796/calhoun-looms-large-clouds-parting-uconn
"Medcalf: I mean, they just built new football locker rooms and the football team doesn't even have a home for the 2020 season. That's how strong the Big East brand is for UConn.
scoscox wrote:TheBasketballOpinion wrote:https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/27216796/calhoun-looms-large-clouds-parting-uconn
"Medcalf: I mean, they just built new football locker rooms and the football team doesn't even have a home for the 2020 season. That's how strong the Big East brand is for UConn.
What is he saying here? I don’t really think these are related in any way
GoldenWarrior11 wrote:In terms of on-court impact, as Myron notes, I think its greatest consequence will be on the recruiting front. Calhoun strongly recruited the Northeast and D.C. areas -- especially New York -- during the Huskies' run, while also keeping some New England prep school kids home. All of that is in the heart of the Big East. And if you told a top-100 kid from New York he could play against Wichita State and Cincinnati and SMU or he could play against St. John's and Villanova and Georgetown, it's not hard to figure out which he would pick. - Jeff Borzello
Here's an affirmed point that many AAC fans simply could not wrap their heads around. The AAC footprint did not benefit UConn (in any sport). There was no sense of regionalism or geographic rivalry that got anyone in the league excited. It didn't matter that SMU hired Larry Brown, or that Memphis has a top recruiting class, or that Wichita State recently made a Final Four - UConn was never going to be able to get its players, teams or fans excited about playing any of the teams. Now, all the NE players that they will recruit moving forward and guaranteed to have multiple games within the region that they can be seen when playing.
Savannah Jay wrote:GoldenWarrior11 wrote:In terms of on-court impact, as Myron notes, I think its greatest consequence will be on the recruiting front. Calhoun strongly recruited the Northeast and D.C. areas -- especially New York -- during the Huskies' run, while also keeping some New England prep school kids home. All of that is in the heart of the Big East. And if you told a top-100 kid from New York he could play against Wichita State and Cincinnati and SMU or he could play against St. John's and Villanova and Georgetown, it's not hard to figure out which he would pick. - Jeff Borzello
Here's an affirmed point that many AAC fans simply could not wrap their heads around. The AAC footprint did not benefit UConn (in any sport). There was no sense of regionalism or geographic rivalry that got anyone in the league excited. It didn't matter that SMU hired Larry Brown, or that Memphis has a top recruiting class, or that Wichita State recently made a Final Four - UConn was never going to be able to get its players, teams or fans excited about playing any of the teams. Now, all the NE players that they will recruit moving forward and guaranteed to have multiple games within the region that they can be seen when playing.
Exactly...to say nothing of UCONN's teams playing in front of, on average, twice as many fans in the BE as the AAC. I bet anyone a cold beer or 12 that UCONN's attendance goes up at least 50% it's first year in the Big East, because they will have home games against teams their fans actually want to see them play. I would place the same bet that their attendance will never be 7800 like it's been the last few years in the AAC.
billyjack wrote:Savannah Jay wrote:GoldenWarrior11 wrote:In terms of on-court impact, as Myron notes, I think its greatest consequence will be on the recruiting front. Calhoun strongly recruited the Northeast and D.C. areas -- especially New York -- during the Huskies' run, while also keeping some New England prep school kids home. All of that is in the heart of the Big East. And if you told a top-100 kid from New York he could play against Wichita State and Cincinnati and SMU or he could play against St. John's and Villanova and Georgetown, it's not hard to figure out which he would pick. - Jeff Borzello
Here's an affirmed point that many AAC fans simply could not wrap their heads around. The AAC footprint did not benefit UConn (in any sport). There was no sense of regionalism or geographic rivalry that got anyone in the league excited. It didn't matter that SMU hired Larry Brown, or that Memphis has a top recruiting class, or that Wichita State recently made a Final Four - UConn was never going to be able to get its players, teams or fans excited about playing any of the teams. Now, all the NE players that they will recruit moving forward and guaranteed to have multiple games within the region that they can be seen when playing.
Exactly...to say nothing of UCONN's teams playing in front of, on average, twice as many fans in the BE as the AAC. I bet anyone a cold beer or 12 that UCONN's attendance goes up at least 50% it's first year in the Big East, because they will have home games against teams their fans actually want to see them play. I would place the same bet that their attendance will never be 7800 like it's been the last few years in the AAC.
Totally agree. Plus fans of nearby opponents will fill in any vacant seats. Also, UConn's road games will boost the attendance for all of us.
Django wrote:...our chances of having an 8 bid year go up exponentially
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests